Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
eristica logo

Eristica Review

2

·

Poor

Revainrating 2.5 out of 5  
Rating 
2.4
Crypto Projects, ERC20

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Description of Eristica

Eristica is a P2P-platform that drives participation in challenges and online competitions.

Reviews

Global ratings 2
  • 5
    0
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

My views on Eristica as a result of my research.

In my view, the general manner the task served turned into no longer very creative or, in other phrases, a one-of-a-kind aim. It simply claimed that it'd permit customers to make P2P transfers without difficulty and fast at the same time as making sure safety. However, evidently the task is presently out of carrier and has suffered a awesome deal of fulfillment. The internet site of this mission, which I used to comply with continuously, became unexpectedly closed and there has been no…

Pros
  • Finally, I would like to talk approximately my experience with the ERT token. Yes, trading with the token changed into clean and speedy, however I would not pick it because of the excessive transaction charges. Anyway, I recognize that I can't have it as it is no longer traded at the respectable exchanges I use.
Cons
  • the user base is very small.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

My views on Eristica as a result of my research.

In my view, the overall way the project served was not very creative or, in other words, a different goal. It just claimed that it would allow users to make P2P transfers easily and quickly while ensuring security. However, it seems that the project is currently out of service and has suffered a great deal of success. The website of this project, which I used to follow constantly, was suddenly closed and there has been no improvement since that day. In contrast, social media accounts still have

Pros
  • it enabled fast and secure P2P transfers.
  • Twitter account still has an active manager
Cons
  • The website cannot be reached.
  • the user base is very small.
  • removed from exchanges where it was previously listed
  • general user reviews seem negative.