Pros
- Large organizations can basically move forward with the model.
Cons
- No problems
OneLedger Review
14
·
Followers 1
·
Average
Rating
3.6
Crypto Projects, ERC20
Description of OneLedger
OneLedger (OLT) is a cryptocurrency . OneLedger has a current supply of 1,000,000,000 with 506,936,796.9824598 in circulation. The last known price of OneLedger is 0.00431921 USD and is down -6.98 over the last 24 hours. It is currently trading on 7 active market(s) with $413,119.01 traded over the last 24 hours. More information can be found at https://oneledger.io/.
Pros
- Task dependent on the selection of organizations with blockchain innovation
- It offers a side chain network for the different exchanges, addressed the versatility and furthermore proposing the production of side chains through the PKI inside the stage
- It enables to make and deal with your own computerized wallet inside the stage and furthermore the credit framework
- Intended to further develop the business framework among little and enormous organizations Concedes agreement on various blockchain
- Your foundation has clever personality the board
- It has a programming interface that benefits the business visionary
Cons
- There are now a few ventures with comparative attributes
- Your foundation token is underestimated
- There are at present a larger part of organizations that as of now deal with their own Exchange instrument with their own blockchain network
Pros
- Create blockchain arrangements fitting to business needs
- Offers designers the chance to be essential for their enterprise by coordinating through a full hub.
Cons
- The worth of its cash is exceptionally low and is liable to showcase instability.
Pros
- Big companies can simply transition to the model.
- Data exchange has shown to be scalable, simple, and dependable.
- It is an excellent protocol on which to construct DApps.
- To facilitate the nature of enterprises, transparency and traceability can be activated.
Cons
- The concept is similar to that of many other projects on the market
- The project appears to be backward.
Pros
- Develop blockchain solutions appropriate to business needs
- Gives developers the opportunity to be part of their corporation by integrating through a full node.
- It guarantees business solutions according to blockchain technology to provide scalability, interoperability and integration.
Cons
- The value of its currency is very low and is subject to market volatility.
Pros
- OneLedger ecosystem can possibly explore numerous verticals and help conventional businesses exploiting blockchain innovation without stress over the foundation and all the specialized issues and hindrances of it.
- The OneLedger protocol is about availability, between blockchains as well as with the customary world which is basic for any conventional business that desires to utilize blockchain-based solutions.
- The project shows great essentials right now.
- Cross-chain decentralized trade of advanced resources.
Cons
- Drawing in developers and businesses will be a troublesome undertaking as blockchain innovation is still in the beginning of appropriation and businesses are as yet attempting to see how they can profit by it. Investors ought to know that OneLedger actually has a ton of pieces to create which will require significant investment.
Pros
- A very much planned and hearty environment that can possibly be an incredible answer for organizations hoping to use and embrace blockchain innovation.
- It tends to be utilized in different use cases on the grounds that the organization is completely secluded and can be modified by companies as indicated by their requirements.
- The group is experienced and have a solid scholarly foundation.
- The protocol is bind skeptic and plans to guarantee network with customary frameworks.
Cons
- The blockchain for business segment in the market has solid rivalry with ventures with all the more financing and footing.
Pros
- Business interaction solution for businesses with Blockchain or want to build a chain
Cons
- The idea is basically good, but businesses have more ways to interact instead of using their technology
- I haven't seen any kind of potential customers for projects other than business companies, they need to use their technology in other areas more appropriately.
- KuCoin is the only exchange I am comfortable with when they list their tokens, so far there are no plans to list their tokens on larger exchanges.
Pros
- Individuals, small businesses or enterprises can build their own blockchain (including the same properties of OneLedger blockchain, assets, wallets, and the credit system they want)
- The conventional businesses can easily switch to the model of OpenLedger
- Data sharing turns out to be scalable, simplistic, and reliable thanks to the infrastructure
- It has a clear economy for its own token - OLT
- OpenLedger is a good protocol to build the DApps on
- Transparency and traceability can be switched on to facilitate the nature of businesses
Cons
- The idea is the same as a lot of existing projects on the market. The low liquidity on the various exchanges has somehow proven that the community hardly feel hype about his project
- Currently, the volume is low and this is not a good sign
- The project seems unprogressive to most of people as the development, the MVP and the interaction with the community are somehow insufficient
Pros
- Marketplace system. This thing can allow developers to sell solutions and modules for develop own blockchain.
Cons
- You can’t buy OLT by fiat because this cryptocurrency trades only for crypto: BTC, ETH, ATOM. Also I can’t say that OLT already has world famous. You can buy it only in KuCoin, Hotbit, CoinEX and IDEX.
Pros
- OneLedger is a Blockchain Solutions company that supports their customer’s blockchain needs. It enables building business applications through modularization tools. Its cryptocurrency- OLT- operates on the Ethereum platform. This token can be traded on the some exchanges
- Good scalability -Loading Transaction processing to side-chains ensures
- Centralized and decentralized networks together, to bring businesses to Web 3.0
- INTEROPERABILITY- Cross-chain mechanics built into the protocol architecture with Lynx Engine
- Public Network- Testnet, Chronos, accessible through Google Cloud Marketplace.
Cons
- Little information about this project and no great expectation of progress either, which leads us to believe that it may be being discontinued
Pros
- Project based on the adoption of companies with blockchain technology
- It offers a side chain network for the various transactions, solved the scalability and also proposing the creation of side chains through the PKI within the platform
- It gives the ability to create and manage your own digital wallet within the platform and also the credit system
- Designed to improve the business system between small and large companies Admits consensus on different blockchain
- Your platform has intelligent identity management
- It has a programming interface that benefits the entrepreneur
Cons
- There are already several projects with similar characteristics
- Your platform token is undervalued
- There are currently a large majority of companies that already manage their own Transfer mechanism with their own blockchain network
Pros
- Compatibility with other block chains.
- Decentralized Atomic Exchanges
- Enhanced scalability
- Possibility of creating lateral intelligent contracts and are compatible with other chains.
Cons
- There are projects that work on this protocol.
- There are currently decentralized exchanges, reducing the possibilities of OneLedger.
- There are already several atomic exchanges.
- Roadmap poorly supported on what they want to achieve.
- Project seems stagnant and without growth.
Pros
- •The idea is aspirant, good thoughts and is much needed to address the challenges surrounding the scalability and inter connectivity problem facing blockchains. •It focuses on delivering a entrance to centralized enterprises while competitors such as Cosmos and AION are more for the general audience. This allows to better cater to the target users needs. The total addressable market would be smaller than the competitors but the chance to succeed is also increased. •The team members and advisors are comprised of a good mix of technical and business-minded people. We believe the project should not have a difficult time finding enterprises to adopt its solutions.
Cons
- •The team has developed an MVP but it is not obtainable to the public. Therefore, it is hard to analyze the quality of the MVP. •Interoperability is a hot topic and there are a lot of competing blockchain projects aiming to solve the problem. The increasingly crowded space would make it more difficult for this project to stand out.
