Pros
- Its combined nature, combined with a first PoS consensus protocol, allows Qtum applications to be compatible with key blockchain ecosystems, as well as support for mobile devices and IoT devices. .
Cons
- I do not think of any defects.
Pros
- As a blockchain system, one basic application is the token. With QtumX, you can easily build a system for the storage and exchange of tokens. Here the term "token" can be: Gold coins in internet games Gift card distributed by supermarkets Air miles got from airlines These usage scenarios demand several features, like high TPS, fast confirmation and thin client. All these features are supported in QtumX.
Cons
- just has a concept, an idea but no product or demo product last time I checked.
Pros
- Smart contract based applications are also worth expecting. You can transform written contracts or rules into smart contracts of QtumX. By this way, the contract will be transparent, unmodifiable and easy to verify. Using a consortium blockchain to deploy smart contracts has several advantages. The most important one is that the developer only need to run some miner nodes for the blockchain, rather than consume public blockchain tokens which are really expensive.
Cons
- China can be pros as well as BIG cons when it comes
Pros
- We will try to make most parameters configurable in the Enterprise version. So that the system can be easily applied to various usage scenarios. Some customizable settings are listed as follows: The genesis block: block_time, coinbase. Network parameters: pchMessageStart, seeds. Parameters for the PoA consensus algorithm: interval, timeout. Block reward parameters: initial value, nSubsidyHalvingInterval
Cons
- I do not think of any defects.
Pros
- Supply chain management: track products from the producer to the retailer
Cons
- During the launch of Qtum’s mainnet 100 million Qtum were issued. Since the launch of the mainnet, only a portion of these tokens were swapped to mainnet tokens. With the mainnet also came Qtum mining and the associated new Qtum generated from it, in the from of block rewards
Pros
- Education records: record education experience or online courses experience
Cons
- Qtum will always reward miners with new Qtum, which means the amount of Qtum will keep on increasing indefinitely. This can have a negative impact on Qtum’s economy in long term as there might be a point where inflation due to new Qtums produced will slowly decrease. As the rate of inflation diminishes and the total supply goes up while the rewards per block remain constant, an overflow of Qtums can happen.
Pros
- Different from the coinstake in PoS, block miners of PoA are rewarded in the coinbase for simplicity. The contract refund, which is generated by the contract execution in Qtum, should be added to the coinbase as well. Therefore, the coinbase in PoA contains one or more outputs. The first one is paid to the block miner and its amount equals to the sum of transaction fees and block subsidy, while others are contract refund outputs.
Cons
- My understanding is that plasma consists of a "Supreme Court" smart contract and a side chain implementation that interacts with it... Should the plasma smart contract be compatible with the evm for Qtum? Unless I'm mistaken I would say that it's highly possible
Pros
- Luxury: record information of luxury for public verification
Cons
- Solidity is still in its development phase and many new bugs are discovered every other day. Be it the Short address attack or as in many crowdfunding scenarios, where the Ethereum affiliated Solidity smart contract was hacked because of security flaws resulting from a lack in the state of the art with respect to tools for formal verification.
Pros
- DGP (Decentralized Governance Protocol) [2] is a technology used in Qtum, which allows blockchain parameters to be modified through a specially designed smart contract on the blockchain, without any disruption to the ecosystem like soft or hard forks.
Cons
- Qtum probably has to find the scaling solutions for UTXO model by themselves but i believe in the team.
Pros
- Combined Bitcoin Core infrastructure is modified with a compatible version of Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), Qtum integrates the reliability of Blockchain Bitcoin with endless possibilities provided by smart contracts.
Cons
- Although AAL promises to resolve this problem by proposing compatibility to x86 architecture, it is of paramount importance to consider the deficiencies of EVM and solidity to be one and the same as Qtum’s.
Pros
- Qtum uses a decentralized governance protocol that allows blockchain parameters such as block size, block time, gas schedule, and minimum gas prices for contracts to be modified without the need for a fork. I think this is a good project.
Cons
- their team is very good, they work hard to develop QTUM.
Pros
- QTUM uses proof-of-stake for consensus. Its network currently has no outside limit on the amount of tokens to be issued, so the rewards generated for finding new blocks will continue to be distributed indefinitely.
Cons
- The price is quite unstable for a project of this magnitude. I've had to pull out of making purchases of Qtum due to my previous experience and am currently keeping a close eye on it both on the short and long run
Pros
- by developing smart contract technology, QTUM will revolutionize the way Smart Contracts are viewed, developed and used. With x86VM, QTUM will be the first blockchain platform to enable the next generation of DAPPS to come true. very good technology.
Cons
- their project uses very large funds
Pros
- Designed with stability, modularity and interoperability, Qtum is the most important toolkit for building trustworthy, dependable applications that fit in real-world situations. real world.
Cons
- Qtum has no bar on minimum number of Qtum for staking, like Ethereum is proposing minimum of 32 ethers to participate in staking process. So people can try to stake a very less amount and in turn try to confirm malicious transactions, which will be more profitable, with a low risk because of lesser stake. Though with less stake such people will have lesser chances to mine the next Qtum block.
Pros
- For consortium blockchains, the consensus algorithm is usually called PoA (Proof of Authority). Instead of solving a difficult mathematical problem in PoW or holding a large amount of cryptocurrencies in PoS, in PoA, a list of authorized block miners is used to determine which nodes are allowed to create new blocks. The chain has to be signed by the majority of miners, then it becomes a permanent record. It is more efficient and secure since the miners are fewer and more reliable.
Cons
- Schnorr has too little effect to be considered as one of the potential solution.
Pros
- Its combined nature, combined with a first PoS consensus protocol, allows Qtum applications to be compatible with key blockchain ecosystems, as well as support for mobile devices and IoT devices.
Cons
- Infinite Incremental Model, Staking with less loss, Deficiencies with EVM.
Pros
- Decentralized intelligent contracts platform
Cons
- I do not see problems with this technology
Pros
- Blockchains like Bitcoin, Ethereum and Qtum are called public blockchains. They have no access restriction. Anyone can send transactions to them as well as participate in the block creation process. In these cases, many consensus algorithms are developed, such as PoW (Proof of Work) and PoS (Proof of Stake), allowing a large number of users to reach a consensus about who can mine new blocks. These blockchains are generally considered to be fully decentralized.
Cons
- I don't think Qtum is in hands of BTC to fix its scaling issue. i mean it's obvious core team already gave up with scaling while ago. ETH has something like 5-6 scaling solutions waiting in the line while BTC has only one, only one scaling solution which is LN.
Pros
- Qtum, working with its learning partners, develops tools and methods to standardize workflows for smart contract development. This includes accurate translations of human readable contracts for smart contracts and descriptions of its terms and conditions.
Cons
- Every experimental technology exposes some trade offs with its proposed advancements, during my research I found the following disadvantages : Infinite Incremental Model.
Pros
- currently blockchain technology has been developed into a business Separate separation and blockchain computing layers allow greater flexibility. The stacked Qtum approach allows multiple virtual machines or environments to operate on blockchain. and in my opinion it's very transparent
Cons
- many people do not know them more closely
