Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
LUIS RIVERO R photo
Venezuela
1 Level
1191 Review
4270.25 Karma

Review on Tezos by LUIS RIVERO R

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Can you trust this project?

The purpose of this asset is to adapt to the world, this is done by consensus. In other words, the modifications made to the network have to be taken according to the opinion of those who integrate it, thus avoiding unnecessary divisions, that is to say a bifurcation, this being a great point in favor since if it invests in rods it would not be affected by decisions made by some of the members, as is generally the case with other cryptocurrencies. It has similarities of projection with NEO and Etherium, these last two are its main competitors for its characteristics of use, Its problem lies in the existence of others that already have a large market share, such as etherium that for now I consider impossible to overcome due to the usability and expansion of this. One of the reasons for owning assets of this project is that it was maintained among the first 20 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization.
However it has been obscured by different legal problems both by developers and by investors who have sued legally, this generated delays in its inception and implementation as a platform.



Updated 5 years ago
Rating has not been changed
Currently, the token of several companies in the chain of tezos is launched, according to data on its website related to a bank of capitals in Brazil.
At this moment, they are focused on the development of the network and use by new users that create intelligent contracts that give added value to them.
It has several divisions that promote the development of applications adapted to rods, since several programs are being funded in partnership with other companies so that more developers who want to learn about the code and creation of applications with rods can do it.



Pros
  • Team clearly committed to the development of it.
  • Conformation and development since 2014.
  • Everyone interested in the project can vote for the modifications.
  • Possibility of proposing changes in network parameters.  
Cons
  • Basically his main problem is competition.
  • It is not used massively.
  • Impossibility of cosolidation in the market as an alternative
  • Internal conflicts of the CEOs in their beginnings.
  • legal issues.  

Similar reviews