Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor Krzysztof Kor ᠌ photo
1 Level
331 Review
0 Karma

Review on Filter under the sink Geyser Allegro M with tank by Wiktor Krzysztof Kor ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

I thought for a long time and doubted, in the end I decided to mount it without a mineralizer. Firstly, because its volume is such that it’s a little bit of no use anyway, and, secondly, because for the sake of it alone, turn the second hole in the countertop. Well, not hunting at all. As a result, the mineralizer removed and connected the outlet from the post-filter directly to a single-valve valve from the previously existing three-stage flow barrier. The barrier itself, by the way, did not remove it either - it acts as a coarse pre-filter: I thought, why should the good disappear. I read theorists on the Internet who claim that water meters do not see an additional expense. That's - they see everything: when the filter fills the drive, the counter is spinning for itself. I did not record the flow, but did not notice a significant increase in water bills.

Pros
  • Filters really clean: no smells, no tastes, no scale. The hoses in the kit are of normal length, everything reached everywhere. Now, if you need to put a filter somewhere else, then it will also be osmotic without options.
Cons
  • In the instructions, it would not be bad to somehow explain the device of the storage tank, because. at first it is very discouraging that the exit from it is in the same place as the entrance. I had to find out on the Internet that there was internal pressure and a rubber diaphragm. Without this information, it was difficult to understand how to actually mount it all, and why the hell is this in the tank, do I need it or not. The water consumption is greater than that of any flow filter, but for that the quality of cleaning cannot be compared.