Review on Jiusion 2560X1440P Microscope Cellphone Magnification by Drew Poulin

This is definitely a great microscope. The color image is an electrical flat connector with 27 conductors per millimeter - that's 27 cavities, i.e. 54 lines per millimeter. I think this should sum up your opinion of his abilities. Compared to the previous model (X001C7XY8B), the new '2k HD' model (X002WXP5VD) uses a button to control the lights, compared to the previous built-in dimmer which I kind of skip. . The "zoom" function has been removed (which I also miss) and I like the extra printed index arrow to make it easier to position the image (I don't have to white-mark it this time). The oscilloscope worked well from the USB2 port on my Win10 desktop computer, as well as from an Android 7.0 smartphone and Android 4.0 tablet. In the world of electronic chips, different components exhibit different characteristics. I noticed less contrast with this model turned off. The color and depth of field appear to be similar to the previous model, which both work for me. In live use, the new "HD" view is wider (16:9) and appears to result in less scaling (zoom). which is not good for me. The attached picture with smaller numbers is from the newer model and the picture with larger numbers from the previous model - each 640x480 pixels, 96dpi So widescreen "HD" "better"? Maybe in marketing, but not only in my work. Note: The image file of the new model has been cropped to the same size as the previous model to show the difference in magnification. Captured photos have a larger optical area, but a larger photographed area results in less zooming in the photo viewer and therefore less efficient zooming. The CoolingTech software didn't take the photo at the maximum resolution of 1440 pixels (I don't think the software can handle an image of that size; the photo was black). This brings me to a slightly additional "misstatement" about the 2560x1440 resolution - it may have that capability, but could you use it? The best I could get was a 1280x720 picture with the HD capture of a smartphone. I tried extensively with desktop programs but only got 640x480 images. So I'm not sure if the software is realizing its full potential for captured photos, e.g. B. 640 x 480 pixels, 96 dpi, distorted aspect ratio. Widescreen sizes might be nice on a large format screen/monitor, but it doesn't make much of a functional difference since on a widescreen most of the image is mostly extra baggage. The status is the same and although often criticized it is entirely satisfactory. This type of microscope is designed to move around the object, while a traditional microscope brings the object to the microscope. So even a smaller stand is desirable as it minimizes interference - perhaps a longer arm could be used for that. He just has to keep the sight from falling. Ironically, in my live use, I prefer the previous model (X001C7XY8B). The newer model (X002WXP5VD) can produce more detailed zoomed/cropped photos, but I'm not sure if it's available yet. I would suggest re-introducing the digital zoom button function and built in dimmer if possible and that would be overkill for most users.