👀 Nikon ACULON A211 8x42 Binoculars: High Quality Optics for Exceptional Viewing Review

Binoculars budgetary with all the consequences. In fact, you get more than what you paid for. I own 6 binoculars (all budget ones except for the 1980 Carl Zeiss), our golden eagles and BPC are just garbage dumps compared to Nikon. Similar in picture to the Olympus. But budget Olympuses have an even weaker case, for 20 years they ruined 3 pieces. Nikon stands on the windowsill without a cover, the aging of rubber and plastic for 10 years is not noticeable. At a similar Olympus, the central…

binoculars (all budget ones except for the 1980 Carl Zeiss), But budget Olympuses have an even weaker case, for 20 years they ruined 3 the aging of rubber and plastic for 10 the central tuning barrel burst and the rubber bands on the eyepieces cracked

Got pros: Optics! but it also works as a stabilizer: the image does not dance. With its cons: The eyepiece caps don' In general, some little thing will have to be completed so as not to lose the cover.

Pros below: The quality of materials, it is pleasant to hold in hands. Ideal for taking and looking into the distance from your balcony. Its cons: There is no protection against moisture, the lens may fog up.

Different pros: Bright and clear optics. Natural color rendering. Wide field of view. Optimal magnification for handheld observation. Its cons: The main drawback of the cover is dirty lenses. The lens caps are not attached. Soaps around the edges stronger in the left eyepiece. The bag does not have a shoulder strap.

Pros: Very good colors transmission, excellent viewing angle, build quality and materials. Cons: Case for binoculars without a strap, plugs on the lenses are weakly held.

At first I wanted to take 7x35, because. it is the most compact of the Akulon a211 line, but all the same, I took 8x42 due to higher performance, and it is not much larger. I think that 8x42, with aperture ratio of 28, is a universal device for observation up to the complete absence of illumination. I am very satisfied with the purchase. With its pros. Large aperture, at deep twilight and at night with city lighting, you can see well. Bright clear contrast picture. Ergonomics are pleasant…

binoculars were planned for hunting needs for a long time I read about Olympus and Nikon binoculars. varied between a magnification of 10 and 12, as a result, I chose an 8-fold increase, as they say, the picture is not shaking like that, for such money a decent device and not very heavy 700 gr. With its pros. the picture, when properly adjusted, is good, the rubberized case is well held in the hands, convenient center adjustment, protective covers from dust and dirt, a belt, a pouch. Its cons…

Great binoculars for the price. The body is well thought out, the binoculars lie like a glove in the hands, it is conveniently adjusted to anatomical features, even diopters are taken into account if there are features with vision. The rubberized body is a big plus. I dropped it on the primer, it was the case - it had absolutely no effect on performance. The optics are clear, bright, everything is clearly visible even in bad weather conditions and at dusk. The strap and case are good too. Never

Great binoculars! The best choice in its price range. The image quality is simply amazing. Image clarity even at a considerable distance. Easy to set up. The focus wheel rotates gently. Retractable eyecups are very comfortable. Before that I used Veber Zoom 5-15x35 Brasser Hunter 8-24x50 - they cannot be compared with Nikon! I used binoculars for birdwatching.

China also watched different binoculars, of course the sky and the earth in the picture. of the minuses, a magnification of 8 from the hands, of course, there is shaking (10 and above is even more difficult to hold and watch from the hands), I think about 7 multiples all the same, because if you need 20 times or more, it’s cheaper to buy a telescope and at a price and you can watch craters on the moon without tension. + this is nikon, and nikon is the company that makes optics for the space…

The finalization of the lower protective covers is very simple - two small black pieces of cambric tubes (you can insulate from a wire of a suitable diameter) and a thin black cord will save you from the experience of losing these very covers. And you can wear binoculars in a case both on your belt and on your neck (shoulder), you just need to release the strap from the case.

For such a price - you can't think of better binoculars. Nikon is Nikon. At first, I was confused by the fact that the picture is not clear along the edge of the field of view - it turned out that this happens when aiming at objects is not accurate. Accurately pointed and everything is sharp! Quietly suitable for astroobservations. You can safely take - for the home, for the family. And for those who have a salty wind and splashing waves in their faces, those who are met with fog and damp every

When choosing, I looked at lomo, olympus and nikon, of all the listed nikons, in total, the characteristics went ahead and the price was normal, while I watched the action, but when I went to the sign, I found, in principle, an ated action-aculon. At a distance of 3 km, the average text on the advertising (large) stand is read without problems. I measured the distance with . For the money this is a very useful thing, it's amazing when you can see what you can't with normal vision,

To be honest, the binoculars amazed me. I did not expect that the picture in the budget model would be so good. I bought it with sight, in the store I looked at the same time as Aculon 10x42, expensive Prostaff 5 8x42, and expensive Olympus 8x42 EXPS1. The last two are almost twice as expensive. Out of all four, my 8x42 clearly stood out for its brightness, sharpness, and wide field of view. And yet, when with the purchase, I went up the hill to look at the river running below, at the distances