At the beginning I wanted to take Nikon 17-55 or 16-35 to replace Tamron 17-50 After testing two expensive lenses, I came to a non-standard opinion. For some reason, 17-55 used does not have a stable picture, in one corner lighter in another darker, and there is not as much sharpness as they write about it for his money, perhaps for a constructive, but very heavy. At 16-35, the picture is more stable, but not enough to pay for it such an amount and that both of these are focal. I have a staff Nikon 70-300 vr and Tamron 17-50 I wanted a golden mean in the second place. And so, when disappointed with the tests, he was about to leave the store, I accidentally drew attention to the shop window where the Nikon 16-85 vr stood and waited for me. Having tested this lens, I was pleasantly surprised and discouraged. From the first shot, all pictures are stably even, without all sorts of light-dark edges, excellent clarity, very comfortable focal lengths, but as I lay down in my hand, I understood, mine, the "golden mean" For myself and for others, I realized that running after sharpness, to which the eyes quickly get used, takes us away from creativity and growth and leads to a race for lenses. So itβs up to you, my dears, to decide whether to grow in creativity, or constantly pay for sharpness. I would be very happy if I inspired someone for this lens.
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Fixed Lens - Discontinued by Manufacturer
93 Review
Nikon 50mm f/1.8D Lens: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras!
97 Review
Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
78 Review
π· Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Lens with Auto Focus: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras
76 Review