Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm 📷 f/1.8G Lens: Exceptional Image Quality and Versatility Review

This is my third nikkor after 28/1.8 and 105 After the above glasses, almost impossible. 9 out of 10 For me, this is a temporary lens, until there is money for something faster.

Providing my firsthand perspective.Pros below: Fast aperture, fast focus, good quality materials, bokeh. With its cons: Focuses poorly in low light (the trouble with most lenses)

I took f / 1.8D as a replacement, I am very pleased with the purchase and I can advise it as a universal portrait and landscape lens. Different pros: - Sharp; - Fast and tenacious autofocus; - Light weight; - Virtually silent (suitable for video shooting); - Beautiful bokeh (slightly twists, sharp) Got cons: Strong vignetting on an open hole + quite noticeable aberrations.

Unfiltered opinion on the product.Its pros: Very high quality and sharp picture, light, quiet. Cons: The plastic Chinese case, but does not affect the result.

I bought a Nikon d5100 the focal length is 75 there is no distortion (nosing) as on 35 of course, the sharpness is not 100% Although the panoramas come out well! Has some pros: Depth of field! Lightweight, comfortable, Hood and case included. With its cons: It needs a protective filter, as it has such a design that the lens does not move inside,

An ordinary lens, I don’ 50mm 1.8d is more interesting for me for landscapes, it captures the stars in the sun, but it doesn’t, no matter how hard it is.

I use with D3100 I used only whale 18-55 I rarely get it, mm especially for a portrait, and for low light, After the acquisition, after the first three shots, With this lens, even on budget models like my 3100, you can take great pictures.

I use it on a crop, the angle is narrow, but for portraits it’ can be used, just be careful :) It produces razor sharpness at 3.5 worth the money, a good addition to a kit that is satisfying on the short end and downright awful on the long end

What is interesting - when compared with Canon - it seems to be more expensive than Canon's 1.8 on canon, the same sharpness is obtained only with 2.0, or even with 2.2 is many times better than Canon 1.8 this lens simply has no analogues in canon!

In my case, I took it without a camera, so I couldn’t check right away when I started shooting, it turned out that there was a back focus, which is very noticeable with an open aperture, I am satisfied with the purchase and do not regret the money spent.

Some pros: Dust and moisture protection, quiet and fast AF, works with film cameras, inexpensive, good sharpness Different cons: Noticeable color fringing at the edges of the frame and geometric distortion when shooting on film

With its pros: Didn' Somewhat better sharpness at the edges of the frame with 13 Cons below: It is not clear how to use the 1.8 -2.8 aperture range, At the "portrait" distance, In general, there is no practical sense to buy.

I bought a Nikon d5100 the focal length is 75 there is no distortion (nosing) as on 35 of course, the sharpness is not 100% Although the panoramas come out well!

The lens is certainly one of the most affordable, I switched from it to Sigma art 50mm - heaven and earth, as they say, the same thing.

was taken in addition to the 18-55 kit, but the 50mm kit quickly became the primary one; the whale is now sitting unused in the bag it came in. The quality of photographs taken with a 50mm lens is an order of magnitude higher; therefore, I would rather scale a wall in order to ensure that everything is captured within the frame than secure a whale. Those who have stated that the focus is not tenacious or that there is little sharpness at 1.8 are encouraged to become proficient in the aperture…

This third one in a row didn't work out for me with fifty dollars; prior to that, there were two variations of the 1.8D model. They provide me with an unclaimed FR on the crop (Nikon D7100) (there are also 35mm and 85mm). I put it to use for walking light when I don't feel like lugging around a heavy 35ku (Sigma Art) camera because it is both compact and lightweight. The picture is sharp in the center from the start, and it stays sharp in the field even with f/2.8. It also has very good…

Different pros: Very fast, 1.8 is enough for any purpose. And inexpensively priced. Cons below: I honestly thought it would be worse, exceeded all expectations. Very fast and accurate autofocus, you can safely shoot sports at F2.0-F2.8 95% of the shots are in focus.

Some pros: Lightweight, compact, sharp throughout the range, bright, quiet, fast. Cons: Continuation of the advantages: at 1.8 a very small depth of field - the eyes are in focus, and the nose and ears can fall out%) Well, sharpness - conveys all skin defects.

Some pros: -Price -Quality -Lungs -Light weight -Cutting - Draws beautiful bokeh Has some cons I didn’t notice, because my hands grow from that place from where they need to. ))))

This lens itself is extremely decent, especially considering its low cost! I shoot anything from portraits to weddings with no issues using a crop sensor Nikon D200 and a portrait lens that is among the best available. The autofocus is quiet, the speed is about average, and the color reproduction is above average. If the camera does not miss the autofocus, the detail is also above average. The drawback of autofocus is that when there is insufficient light (and even sometimes when there is more…