Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ada Jankowska ᠌ photo
1 Level
183 Review
0 Karma

Review on Wrist watch CASIO Vintage AQ-230A-1D by Ada Jankowska ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It is of good quality, but I won't buy it again.

The watch is good for the money. With careful handling, the appearance of the above disadvantages may not happen. I'm surprised they're still on sale. For those who need illuminated hands or dials, there are more than 3,000 Casio models. I received the watch for the Jam Day and I am still satisfied with the gift. Got pros: Light elegant watch. Having a digital display is very convenient. Stopwatch, calendar, etc. I always set a calendar. The accuracy of the course is declared 30 sec / month, although I don’t remember when I let them down. Dial with minute divisions. Really waterproof and shockproof. I worked in them with a jackhammer, puncher, crowbar - it does not affect the operation of the watch. Batteries will last for 5 years, I have them for 3 years and go. Its cons: The right button (which brings the arrows) quickly began to be pressed only with a ballpoint pen, although, as I said above, they rarely have to be brought down. The upper left button (mode selection on the digital display) is often pressed accidentally. The fact that the chrome on the body is erased first to copper, and then to plastic is not critical for me. No one will wear such a watch to a business meeting anyway. It is a pity that the hands are not SuperLuminova.