Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Indal Mandal ᠌ photo
Delhi
1 Level
128 Review
80 Karma

Review on Archer C20 Wireless Dual Band Router by TP-LINK - IEEE 802.11ac Ethernet with AC750 for Improved Internet Performance by Indal Mandal ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

It's not a good product, it's a pity that I spent money on it.

The most recent version, which goes by the designation v4, is very terrible. If this is a marriage, then it seems like bad luck, but it's not likely at all. I worked my way up through the forum ranks; it turns out that my issue is not unique; additionally, the device is not regarded as a marriage; rather, it states that they are providers! And why in the earth would you put the defaults of these suppliers in your menu in that case? These are some advantages: The apparatus, while functioning, provides a very good speed and almost does not experience any cuts. Various cons: In comparison to the tried and true 841, this miracle was nothing but discouraging. It appears that both the set-top box and the laptop have lost their ability to translate communication. Reboot provided the cure. It is especially frustrating that it can function normally for a whole day without any issues, but then in the evening it will repeatedly run into overload. The reasoning behind his actions is still beyond my comprehension. After submitting a complaint to the vendor, I was given an original response which stated, "Take it up with your provider." Once reinstalling the 841, everything works as expected. On the forum maintained by my internet service provider (Beeline), I was informed that the most recent version of the router is incompatible with a large number of devices, including themselves. I will purchase something else, and I will make an effort to turn over this miraculous device to the authorities; if that fails, I will probably just toss it away.