Gigabits, USB ports, AX, tricky firmware, etc. are, of course, funny whistles, but for me personally they are completely optional. C54, in my opinion, is a great thing, if it’s enough just to distribute the Internet to several devices on a budget, but with high quality. Pros below: It looks great - very compact, made of matte plastic, with neat antennas and unobtrusive indicators (green, not bright, slightly recessed into the body and visible only at a certain angle, turned off if necessary). 5 GHz at low transmitter power gives out 100 Mbps throughout the apartment. On the wire - the same hundred. Excellent control panel - modern, neat, nimble. In TP-Link routers on Linux, for comparison, the panel looks generally the same as it did 10 years ago (in this router OS VxWorks). There are no ventilation holes, but only slightly warm to the touch. Haven't had any stability issues so far. Has some cons There are not enough rubber bands on the legs to make it slip less. The patch cord in the box is white and frail. Very light. If touched, then under the weight of the wires it can rear up. The box, yes, could be made smaller. It is not known what exactly it has inside - this model was not found in the FCC database (the younger and older brothers - C24 and C80 - are). Maybe I didn't search well.
🔌 uni USB C Hub with Ethernet Adapter, 4K HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, and 3 USB 3.0 Ports for MacBook Pro, iPad Pro, XPS
11 Review
UGREEN USB 3.0 Ethernet Adapter Hub with RJ45: Fast Gigabit Ethernet Converter, 3 Ports USB 3.0 Hub Compatible for MacBook, iMac, Surface Pro, Chromebook, Laptop, PC
11 Review
🔌 USR-TCP232-410s: RS232/RS485 Serial to Ethernet Adapter/IP Device Server with DHCP/DNS Support
4 Review
🔌 CERRXIAN RS232 to Ethernet Serial Device Server - TCP/IP Converter with 1Port DB9 RS232 Serial to Ethernet Connectivity
3 Review