Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Damyanti Dhasmana ᠌ photo
Delhi
1 Level
148 Review
161 Karma

Review on Powerful Intel Core i7-3770K Quad-Core Processor with 8MB Cache and LGA 1155 Compatibility - BX80637I73770K by Damyanti Dhasmana ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good balance of price/quality, recommend it.

In general, the percentage is not bad, it makes sense to take a closer look at those who do not set maximum overclocking as their goal, it accelerates up to 4200 and works without problems. We can say that this is its regular frequency. Next, you need a good cooler, I have an average Zalman for 1.5 pieces, so I'm not going to drive anymore. For me, the main set-up is that the integrated graphics do not always work correctly. A vivid example of MODO, which just crashes or hangs. At work, I have a sandy with HD3000, there are problems with ating the screen, often buggy. There are a lot of complaints about Intel graphics, especially on English-language resources. So, who works with graphics, it is better not to count on the built-in graphics core. With built-in AMD graphics, I didn’t know grief, and now, despite the fact that I don’t need crazy video performance, I’ll have to buy discrete graphics. It's even more offensive that I took the 3770 precisely because of the reluctance to buy a video card, I would have known, I would have taken the 3820 and the mother for 2022. If you take it for the Internet and games, relying on the built-in video core, then there seems to be no problem here, except of course for low performance compared to discrete video cards. For users of the sandy bridge, there is no point in ating the stone to this one. Comparing with the i5, which is at work, you do not notice a difference in speed with everyday tasks. It is noticeable only in 3d rendering, for example, and of course in tests.

Pros
  • If you do not set records for overclocking, then it is quite cold 30-48 degrees, depending on the load. Performance is top notch. There are stones and faster of course, but they already cost quite inadequate money for the average user.
Cons
  • Not as overclockable as its predecessor. The built-in graphics core is weird in some programs. Climbed on an Internet, a lot of complaints about HD graphics. Intel is clearly outperforming AMD here. The price tag is high IMHO.