Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Bogdan Andreev แ Œ photo
1 Level
246 Review
0 Karma

Review on ๐Ÿ’จ Revolutionary Dyson Cyclone Lightweight Cordless Cleaner: Unmatched Cleaning Power without the Cords! by Bogdan Andreev แ Œ

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

Lightweight, portable, with high suction power . What comments can there be? It's just incredibly comfortable. He would also have a nuclear battery from the fallout and a simpler mechanism for opening a gl for dust - what a device it would be! But it's so good too. Let's not quibble :) I recommend it in general. Its pros: 1. Mobility and relative lightness. No, it's the 21st century. 2. Power. Sucks like crazy. And at maximum power at the other end of the device, there is clearly a window into deep space. Smooth surfaces, carpets, bedspreads, mattresses - he doesn't give a damn what to vacuum. If there is dust, this shushpanzer will find it. 3. When working at the first power, the charge is enough for a couple of quick runs in a odnushka or one general cleaning (ICSH, even with light cleaning, get ready to empty the dust can - you get the feeling that they werenโ€™t cleaning at home, but in a house. Multi-apartment. ) 4. Parking. Vacuumed, hung, forgot. Repeat if necessary. 5. A bucket of attachments for every occasion. Narrower, wider, for smooth surfaces, rough, furry. In short, for any need within the main function. 6. All reusable, no hemorrhoids with filters/bags etc. Do not pour water inside the device, and the dust cup and filter are easily washed under the gander. Some cons: 1. Pts would like the ability to work at maximum power mode with a connection to the network, and not from batteries. Yes, Li-Ion, all the cases, and for their power they charge relatively quickly, but when you turn on the third mode to clean the same mattresses, the life in the batteries dries up before our eyes. There is an opinion that the possibility of working from the network at maximum power was cut out of the unit in order to protect the heart of the device from overloads (considering how it threshes at maximum, itโ€™s no wonder). But you want to! 2. A latch would be for him for the power on, so as not to keep it pressed with a finger during operation. Well, there: I pressed the on, clicked the latch, removed my finger from the on . PROFIT ! Like rotary hammers, drills etc. 3. I donโ€™t know about the rest of the owners of the subject, but cleaning the โ€œglโ€ for dust is an explosion of the brain. From the moment of purchase, it sticks unrealistically when you try to take it off - it walks sooo tight on the sled. The wife can not - I'm worried myself. The lid of the gl for dust, by the way, also lives its own life: it opens only when Mars is in the third house, or even when you completely remove the gl from the sled. 4. Wall holder. Once there was a need to remove the bracket already screwed to the wall, and an attempt to get to the screws with which it was stuck gave rise to a lot of interesting and not very censorship questions due to the completely non-illusory chances to break the whole STE economy.

Comments (1)

Please, sign in to write a comment
July 14, 2023
Nice, efficient device.