Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ada Dymarska  photo
1 Level
155 Review
0 Karma

Review on ๐Ÿ MIKASA V200W Volleyball by Ada Dymarska

Revainrating 3 out of 5

I can't say that I was completely satisfied with the product.

after the purchase, I noticed an absurdity in the description of the seller: "Tire material: microfiber, polyurethane, Ball material: artificial leather." What are you writing about? The tire and the material of the ball in this case are the same! From the point of view of the accuracy of manufacturing, it is impossible to find fault with the appearance! It is difficult to understand the original or not without being a professional. We will look for experts to explain.

Pros
  • They didnโ€™t understand anything: there is a stamp โ€œAll-2022 Volleyball Federationโ€ on the photo, but not on the received ball. It can also be faked like everything else))) but nevertheless. Declared size 5. And the circumference is 64.5 cm, i.ะต. does not meet the standard for the fifth size from 65 cm to 68 cm. Inflated to the maximum. May stretch with use.
Cons
  • It is stated about this model (not on the seller's page, but in general in the reviews of this model: "Soft non-slip coating material provides clear contact with the ball when receiving and serving." Still like sliding! Considering that it is less than FIVE in circumference, in the hand You can't hold a teenager (large hand) Soft coating material - yes The camera is hard Maybe the aerodynamics and geometry are good because of this (haven't tested it yet) ) already existing experience (year of the ball) is tactilely more pleasant, more tenacious.