Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Jnis Banders ᠌ photo
1 Level
317 Review
0 Karma

Review on AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AM4 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler (YD1600BBAFBOX) - 65W Energy Efficiency by Jnis Banders ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

Compared to the past, 860K is noticeably faster, especially in resource-intensive tasks. FPS also increased, for example, in a Test Drive - where it was 190 it became 260. Single-stream somewhere between 4790 and 6700, in multi-stream all competitors are far behind. The CPU-Z and Cinebench R15 programs are starting to underestimate the results for it too, so you should not trust their testimony. For example 860K - at first it showed 353 points in Cinebench R15, after a year already 347 and the latest version was "finalized" to 326. Obviously, they are trying a little so that it is not noticeable. But persistently and methodically. In general, the percentage is excellent, it still has no competitors, it works faster than it is put up everywhere. The screenshots show different versions of CPU-Z after and before cheating with single-threaded results, and several tests from Aida showing a two-three (!) multiple advantage over 6700-7700 in some tasks.

img 1 attached to AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AM4 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler (YD1600BBAFBOX) - 65W Energy Efficiency review by Jnis Banders ᠌
img 2 attached to AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AM4 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler (YD1600BBAFBOX) - 65W Energy Efficiency review by Jnis Banders ᠌
img 3 attached to AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AM4 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler (YD1600BBAFBOX) - 65W Energy Efficiency review by Jnis Banders ᠌



Pros
  • A heat spreader in the entire area, classic legs - the conclusions are still better than contact pads for processors. Even outwardly it is clear that AMD has not yet lost common sense. Solder under the cover too and 6 cores and 12 threads and performance per core.
Cons
  • Low acceleration, up to 3.9 - 4.0. Prices, especially for memory today, but this no longer applies to the processor. Additional 2 cores not caught

Similar reviews