Review on 💪 AMD FD6300WMHKBOX FX-6300 Black Edition: 6-Core Processor with Unparalleled Performance by Mateusz Gsiewski ᠌

Name: 💪 AMD FD6300WMHKBOX FX-6300 Black Edition: 6-Core Processor with Unparalleled Performance
Item: 💪 AMD FD6300WMHKBOX FX-6300 Black Edition: 6-Core Processor with Unparalleled Performance
Rating: 5

July 10, 2023

Everything in the product suited me, the price is generally perfect.

The second machine had a C2D E6600 (3400 MHz self-overclocking, DDR2 667 MHz) processor. I made the decision to replace the computer a long time ago because I was quite irritated by Intel's refusal to drop the price of its quad-core processors. I considered switching to AMD's phenom II x4 when those processors were up to 4K while Intel quads were kept at the level of 11–8K, but I had to put up with it. I determined right away that enough with inetl, I'll try amd when the computer was full of mother + bp and it was time to eat it. They frequently argued that Intel brakes are cooler than AMD brakes in the workplace, etc. It didn't scare me because, according to several tests, amd'shki was a good fit for me. I tested the code first, and I was impressed at how rapidly everything rendered. to recall. and that's with a 32-bit version of Windows. What will happen when I upgrade to a 64-bit version? mmm
Because of this, I didn't notice much of a difference in the old computer's overall performance. If only it were still alive, it would be sufficient for everyday tasks (apart from video coding and lanes).
Given that there are so many reviews already here, why did I choose to create one? Just to refute the rumor that AMD brakes are bad, I have absolutely no regrets about switching to them. Such trash does not exist with a permanently interchangeable socket, and their costs are very costly. Additionally, the margin for multi-threads is justified even further by this proportion of 5000.
By the way, the CPU revision for Germany was received for my note, therefore the box cooler performs admirably and doesn't overheat under load. With a copper-only Zalman 9500 cooler, the E6600 at 3.4Ghz heated up to 60°C under load and to about 45°C at idle. By the way, I appreciated the simple auto overclocking mechanism for 2 and all cores and the energy-saving feature in the new types of processors.

Pros

The FX-8320 is affordable while yet being effective for any task. Even when using CUDA, it connects cores and loads 100% in two-pass avc/h264 video encoding. generally suitable for encoding video. I chose to take a third computer on this platform because all the couples were continuously complaining about AMD. I didn't fail, and I didn't notice anything slow. I measured the BOX's idle core temperatures, which ranged from 9 to 32 to 45 degrees Celsius under the cover. The packaged cooler is therefore not awful. But eventually, I'll undoubtedly invest in a large one for overclocking. Yes, he eats reasonably, but read evaluations of fcentr or elsewhere I forgot to look at professor review sites. In general, I don't understand those who write about consumption. In loads up to 95 watts, Intel does not significantly outperform AMD. In loads up to 125 watts, Intel outperforms AMD. What is the biggest difference here? This is for Intel enthusiasts. It consumes little loads when in idle state (I guess I didn't check how many cores). This is what automatic - 1400 MHz further up to 4000 MHz for two cores and up to 3500 MHz for all cores. (I haven't entered the BIOS yet, and the auto works perfectly.)

Cons

Even though Dada 32nm is not a true 8x core, it would still be competitive. Although I don't dispute Intel's claim that its processors will be more powerful per core, their prices are exorbitant, which should not be overlooked, and their regularly updated sockets will require eating the mother + percent, perhaps since 2022, processor power hasn't truly increased.