Review on Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens, black by Keisuke Shimizu ᠌

- a very high price, but, for the most part, it is justified, after all, L and there is a difference with ƒ / 1.4 -not the best autofocus by modern standards (but quite good), the notorious shift focus inherent in such large relative apertures. -terrible HA and low sharpness in the open, up to about 1.8 holes are not working at all - about the two previous points: already quite old, this is the first of 50 and 85 ƒ / 1.2 canons, but 85 is even tighter with autofocus . - a bit old (2022), hence the autofocus and sharpness and HA, which do not compete with new lenses, even zooms of a similar price (this is, of course, 24-70 II and 70-200 II), but somewhere (in terms of sharpness and HA) and fixes (non-L) and zooms (L) are cheaper, but newer. - a bit old, which means it is not very promising for a purchase, because it should be ated, which will cause an obvious decrease in prices for it. At the beginning of 2022, the 35L ate is finally being heard, otherwise it’s not funny anymore, it (EF 35 ƒ / 1.4L USM) was announced in 1998 and there’s not even dust-moisture protection, what to say about the rest, about the new half a tone is not yet heard. -he loses to the EF 24-70 II in everything except aperture of course. For a comparable price - the difference is about 10-15K at the beginning of 2022: about 50K for 50 mm and 60-65K for 24-70 II.