Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Gabriela Kopcewicz ᠌ photo
1 Level
77 Review
0 Karma

Review on Nokian Tires Hakkapeliitta 9 185/65 R15 92T winter by Gabriela Kopcewicz ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

The product is definitely not worth the nerve, better not take it.

The most important thing - as it turned out, the notorious guarantee from Nokian, thanks to which many, including me, are ready to overpay - DOES NOT WORK. Wrote in support, sent a link to fill out the form. Filling out this form is a separate epic, you need to enter a large amount of unnecessary information and attach a bunch of photos (it’s good that they didn’t force them to attach analyzes)). Then there were additional interrogations, re-photographing. They pretend to be interested in the problem, they are playing for time (the communication went on for about 2 months), and the result is the same - you are not driving correctly! If it were the cheapest rubber, one would understand, but in this situation the opinion about rubber is spoiled and I consider such an attitude towards the client to be unacceptable.

Pros
  • Brand, good grip in any weather
Cons
  • Like all previous Hakki - noisy and harsh. Doesn't work well in loose snow And probably got a defective batch, but Nokian does not recognize this. For a season with a mileage of about 7-8 thousand km, there is almost no wear on the rubber, but a third of the spikes on all wheels are missing. At the same time, a "sleeve" from the spike remains inside the hole, only the tip flies out. I did the run-in as always, the driving style has not changed. This set is clearly a mess. Prior to that, on Hakka 5, 3 seasons I went to Hakka 7 - 2 spikes were lost on all 4 wheels. Next season I skated on Hakka 8, all the spikes are in place. Clutch 9-ki seemed a little worse.

Comments (1)

Please, sign in to write a comment
July 10, 2023
With its pros: More than satisfied with tires Has cons: Yes, noisy . There are spikes - there is noise, so the disadvantage is subjective