Review on Nikon AF-S FX NIKKOR 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED Vibration Reduction Zoom Lens: Ultimate Auto Focus Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras by Dinesh Anand ᠌

For trips, I went through a lot of telephotos, superzooms and bundles (standard + telephoto), but I had to abandon all of them. televisions with aperture ratio of 2.8 are usually heavy, and such as 55-200VR, 55-300VR have a "flimsy" design with a backlash of the trunk, a "dumb" stabilizer of the first series (the picture is already bouncing) and poor detail at the long end of distant objects (more than 200-300m, this also applies to 18-200VR). Bundles (standard + telephoto) are inconvenient due to poor efficiency and dust on the matrix in extreme conditions when the lenses are refastened. I chose this superzoom (28-300VR) with an eye to switching to FF, but the wide end will have to be sacrificed for some time, but the picture pleases me more in comparison with the lenses in my arsenal. There are not enough stars from the sky, but the picture it is more voluminous and plastic than its cropped counterparts. I advise you to take a closer look at this lens for those who travel a lot and even on crop, because. 18-200VR is not much cheaper (but then it will be problematic to sell it for an adequate price). Photos can be viewed in jpg without processing (4pcs) with the stub turned off. http://fotki. . Ru/users/rudichnick/view/631742/?page=1 http://fotki. . Ru/users/rudichnick/view/639773/?page=1 I broke up with this lens, because. I bought the D800 and after lengthy tests I came to the conclusion that it does not really match this matrix. But at a lower resolution, the lens will please many amateur photographers, especially when traveling.