The camera costs several times more than my d3200, which I owned for 7 years. And after 7 years, the crop remained a crop. The detailing of the d500 with the smallest lack of lighting is no higher than that of the d3200, the d500 is just as noisy. Tollo noise reduction has improved, but the detailing has not grown from this, but even vice versa. Shumadav of course removes color noise, but too much and the photos become blurry. In general, the detailing of the d500 is even slightly lower (completely) than that of the d3200, but the latter still has more pixels. I didnβt expect it, of course, that there would be no growth. Now I sold the camera, bought myself a d700 and a lens. The difference with the full frame is heaven and earth . But the d700 is already old, those colors are no longer there . Do not overestimate the autofocus of the d500 either. Of course, he is a top, but still it happened to "seek" with a lack of lighting, on low-contrast objects. There is progress, but not a miracle. The same d700 is worse in autofocus, but not by much. In general, if you are an ordinary photographer, do not buy! The same d750 will give a better picture and a more beautiful background blur . I am writing so that people do not make the same mistake as me. My d700 now pleases me much more for my purposes: wedding photography, love story, family, children . Full frame gives a completely different picture.
Nikon COOLPIX L810 Digital Camera: 16.1MP, 26x Zoom, NIKKOR ED Glass Lens, 3-inch LCD (Blue)
95 Review
Canon EOS 60D: 18MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera Body - Your Next Photography Companion
125 Review
Canon PowerShot A480 camera, black
108 Review
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera with Auto Focus-S Nikkor Zoom Lens (Discontinued by Manufacturer)
109 Review