The camera costs several times more than my d3200, which I owned for 7 years. And after 7 years, the crop remained a crop. The detailing of the d500 with the smallest lack of lighting is no higher than that of the d3200, the d500 is just as noisy. Tollo noise reduction has improved, but the detailing has not grown from this, but even vice versa. Shumadav of course removes color noise, but too much and the photos become blurry. In general, the detailing of the d500 is even slightly lower (completely) than that of the d3200, but the latter still has more pixels. I didnβt expect it, of course, that there would be no growth. Now I sold the camera, bought myself a d700 and a lens. The difference with the full frame is heaven and earth . But the d700 is already old, those colors are no longer there . Do not overestimate the autofocus of the d500 either. Of course, he is a top, but still it happened to "seek" with a lack of lighting, on low-contrast objects. There is progress, but not a miracle. The same d700 is worse in autofocus, but not by much. In general, if you are an ordinary photographer, do not buy! The same d750 will give a better picture and a more beautiful background blur . I am writing so that people do not make the same mistake as me. My d700 now pleases me much more for my purposes: wedding photography, love story, family, children . Full frame gives a completely different picture.
Revamped Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera: 24.3MP SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and Power Zoom Lens
103 Review
Canon PowerShot A480 camera, black
108 Review
Nikon D5100 Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm VR Lens - High Resolution 16.2MP
172 Review
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera Body (Kit Box) - No Lens Included, International Version with No Warranty
298 Review