Review on 📷 High-Quality Sigma 35mm F1.4 Art DG HSM Lens for Canon, Black, Compact Size (340101) by Adisorn Srisawam ᠌

f1.4 in operation Utilized with great care, but mostly through the perspective of a single grain of sand! If there was a way to get it back, I would gladly do so. I am not going to use 35mm on the crop. It didn't go so well with the vet, and because we were in a rush, our attention suffered as a result. I purchased it with a back focus, and because of that, I had to send it from the Hong Kong region back to Hong Kong for adjustment. In addition, I had my Elka and other cameras with me. After the modification was made, it got better, although there are still some missed opportunities. The image has a Zeiss-like quality to it. I use it on canon 550d eos. I loaned it to a colleague who uses the Canon 5D Mark III, on which it functions faultlessly and has been meticulously calibrated. The wedding was filmed by the individual. It would seem that the lens is not fully suited for use with the 550d. The individual grains of sand are the only thing that have really gotten under my skin, which begs the question: how can this be? After all, I did show him the wonders of nature by bringing him to the park and the forest, and I am very careful. The Canon 70-200F4L does not exist in any form whatsoever. I bought it for 28,0001 dollars. It had been 5 years. I sent my package from Hong Kong through DCHL, which cost me 2,5000 yuan, and my return trip cost me 2,500 yuan plus an adjustment of 1,000 roses. I don't know, I won't buy Sigma again. Then there are many who argue that sigma35 is intended to be yellow. There isn't any yellowness here, as far as I can tell everything is good with me. At f/1.6, there is a slight toning effect, and I quite enjoy it.