📷 High-Quality Sigma 35mm F1.4 Art DG HSM Lens for Canon, Black, Compact Size (340101) Review

When I bought it, it didn’ And so it was possible to shoot only starting from aperture 4.0 At 1.4 from a distance of a meter, the miss was about 8

I use this lens and, in principle, the materials are reliable, its main advantage is aperture, The focal length of 35mm, in my opinion, is well suited for artistic or portrait photography (taking into account the crop factor) the aperture forms a round hole, so that with a blurry background (bokeh), the blur is deep and soft,

I don’ ) But I can’t resist! Bravo Sigma! I set myself up to buy 35 and I still wanted to collect the "golden three" . ) I honestly thought that after 135L and 85 having shoveled a bunch of reviews and reviews of real people, oily bokeh, an ideal lens! Bravo Sigma!

this is a working 1.4, in general, absolutely not usable with my 5 As for the bokeh - in my subjective opinion, there is a blur, the glass is not usable on Canon (I have not heard of such a problem with Nikon)

Its pros: (although you need to choose from several and make an amendment) Sigma is better. Cons below: the hood is so firmly attached to the body that it is almost impossible to remove.

I have both 24L and 35 and 50 and 135, only the 85th is not available, know how Sigma succeeded, maybe someone can see something with a microscope, but the joy of peeling at 1.4 I'm even glad, otherwise how can the owners of 35L reassure themselves?

It blurs while focusing on infinity even during the day on the street, and no matter how I attempted to set it up, nothing helps. However, if you focus manually on infinity, everything is sharp. I got this lens with delivery from Hong Kong (I myself live in Hong Kong). I have only so far taken a few test images (focused on the center point) and a few test shots, firing at a target after adjustment.

I have been using it for 2 years, despite the above shortcomings, I attached an example photo on this gl, as well as a photo of a paint defect on the case. Pros: - Significantly cheaper than an elka with such parameters from Canon -Very nice picture for my eye, excellent contrast, good sharpness at an open aperture -Works without problems in conjunction with EOS R through an adapter, it opens well on its 30 megapixels -Chromatic aberrations are not critical, easily eliminated during photo…

Pros: The lens, one might say, bokeh is very pleasant, it should be said about how it is made: As is customary with Sigma (or Canon . ), in my case, when focusing on distant objects, as usual with us, and "after" the intervention, I recommend purchasing the included USB Dock Station, To take or not to take? Of course, there is a risk of running into problems with focusing, why I rate it 5 Ru/users/vr-connection/album/212119/? p=0 35mm is Sigma.

I use a Canon 550D for my photography. When shooting from a distance of 1.3 meters, it is optimal to aim for 1.3 persons. When shooting things, it's best to do so from a distance of between 0.3 and 1 meter. When they got it back, they put it through its paces on a Canon 6D and found that it functioned flawlessly. After that, I decided to convert to a Canon 550D. The attention has begun to be drawn to the front. No reflash was performed. The sharpening is done manually while using live view…

Pros: As many have already said: 1. sharp at all apertures 2. constructive inspires confidence 3. adequate price 4. mugs in bokeh Has some cons There are small graters with flash focus. Chromatitis on the edge on the open, quite strong, you have to be careful when shooting contrasting scenes.

After having used the lens for the past two years, I would like to give my feedback about it. I do a lot of photography, and my go-to focal ratio is 35. The lens, on its own, is shockingly sharp even when stopped down to 1.4, and it has a really nice overall aesthetic. Before that, there were sigma lenses, which were completely outclassed by the competition. Almost half a year into my experience, I was completely content; but, beyond that point, the typical Sigma challenges started cropping up…

As I have previously mentioned, there is a significant issue with backlighting. There is one more minor flaw in this glass: when you photograph, for instance, a person in full growth on a fully open one, forget about sharpness; however, if you close the aperture to 2-2.8, the picture will be completely sharp; on in my opinion, this cannot even be attributed to the minuses, the aperture ratio remains very good. The vignetting is not only noticeable, but also really pleasant; it does not detract…

Has pros: Great full frame lens. The image quality is not inferior to L-th optics. The same Japanese quality. Has some cons 1 Price. SIGMA caught up with CANON in price. 2 There is only one authorized service in the country.

Folks, I'm telling you, this is hands down the best lens. The picture is stunning, and its adaptability, high quality, and overall beauty make it the best example I've ever seen of its kind. I am required to perform a great deal of reporting in addition to photographing weddings. As a result of this Sigma, I decided to sell my Elka 24-105 lens because it was gathering dust while sitting in its case. When you reach the age of 35, you will find that it is much easier to photograph groups as well…

f1.4 in operation Utilized with great care, but mostly through the perspective of a single grain of sand! If there was a way to get it back, I would gladly do so. I am not going to use 35mm on the crop. It didn't go so well with the vet, and because we were in a rush, our attention suffered as a result. I purchased it with a back focus, and because of that, I had to send it from the Hong Kong region back to Hong Kong for adjustment. In addition, I had my Elka and other cameras with me. After…

I made it through a few trips to other countries while using the lens as my standard lens on the 5d, and overall, I am quite pleased with the purchase that I made. The new Sigma Art line is extremely impressive. The lens has a design and build quality that are comparable to those of Zeiss lenses, and unlike older Sigma models, this one does not have any issues with back or front focus. When compared to the Canon 16-35 2.8 and the Canon 50 1.4 lenses, which I have previous experience with, this…

I was still considering purchasing a 50 1.4 in order to get the right proportions of faces and objects in my photographs. You can take images of oneself at a distance using the phone in a manner quite similar to how you would normally do so. Customers prefer that their images be larger than 35 millimeters by 50 millimeters. Longer-focus optics draw proportions differently, which is why you can't shoot with any phone that has shorter-focus optics. The phone can take pictures with a focus of 35…

The fact that the lens did not require any adjustments to be made on the 7D camera was the first thing that pleased the lens. Nevertheless, the 5D Mark III did not agree with the original camera; nonetheless, because in-camera alignment was an option, this did not create a problem. Some users mentioned in passing comments that they noticed the lens did not function in the most optimal way on the 5D Mark III when it came to the side focus points. On my camera, I didn't even notice that this was…

When I realized that I intended to shoot in houses and flats, I came to the conclusion that I required a piece of film that was wider than the standard fifty kopeck piece. There were two different lenses to choose from: either the New Canon 24-70mm 2.8 or the 35mm. As there is not a lot of light in the sunny city that we call St. Petersburg, I realized that 1.4 would still be the more appropriate value. After that, there was a decision to be made between Canon and Sigma art. Because there were…