Review on Hankook Tire Winter i*Pike RS2 W429 215/50 R17 95T by Stanislaw Sipko ᠌

On our roads that have potholes, I do not advocate purchase, especially considering how close in price Michelin, Jaca, and Conti are to being in the top three tire brands. Got pros: On ice and snow, it stops and accelerates with ease, while on dry and wet pavement, it stops and accelerates with self-assurance. It would be beneficial to keep the spikes, as none of them fell out throughout the 3,000 kilometers that we traveled. 4–5 points are awarded for silence, noise, acceleration, and deceleration. The remaining numbers all total fewer than three. Some cons: It rides much worse while reversing in the snow, therefore if you plan to park in the snow, it is preferable to immediately drive in backwards so that there are no problems with leaving later. If you plan to park in the snow, you should drive in backwards immediately. When traveling at speeds greater than 50 miles per hour (80 kilometers per hour), it begins to scour the road, and you are need to constantly catch the automobile. If this is not very visible when traveling at 80 miles per hour, then it will become more noticeable as your speed increases. The greater your speed, the more difficult it will be to keep the car on the road (bumps, ruts). The most significant negative is that he has a fear of pits. When he was going 100 kilometers per hour, he fell into a pit that was approximately 30 centimeters long and 10 to 15 centimeters deep. Almost immediately, he suffered a hernia (although the blow was not particularly forceful because the pit simply flew over). This is not the case with Khaka and Mishka, according to the experience of those who have operated them for more than 15 years all year round without experiencing even a single hernia, even when traveling through larger pits at speeds ranging from 20 to 120 kilometers per hour.