Review on Cordiant Snow Cross 2 SUV 215/60 R17 100T winter by Stanislaw Banasiuk ᠌
The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.
replaced in February, when I realized that the Nokian tires were already beyond repair (10 years, hehe, the date was the final straw - I studied the code, understood the year of manufacture, and decided that this was already a risk), drove as expected - 70 kilometers without sudden accelerations, 700 not higher than 100 (again, not exactly, they said in the tire service, I skated it and forgot), then I stopped being shy when replacing it with a summer one, the spikes were in place (a thousand I made my decision by comparing it to Nokian; nevertheless, instead of the model that was on the car, a "budget" version of "Nordman" came out; yet, because a model with totally studded tread was more expensive, Nordman elected not to take it. I looked at a number of films, all of which had a great deal of negative feedback indicating that the videos had been purchased, read the reviews, and came to the conclusion that there were about as many negative evaluations as there were for Nokian. The initial iteration of the Cordiant SnowCross, in addition to other Cordiants (someone had spikes right on the seam in plenty), received a great deal of negative feedback; the SnowCross2 improved upon the design of the other Cordiants. Whether it be in marketing or business, I intend to keep looking this winter.
- The spikes have been installed, and the sidewalls, according to what they appear to be writing, are now thicker. I am hopeful that this is the case, since the prior iteration of the Nokian Hakka had some type of (changed that year, I forget what it was) right front on the parebriki that eventually rubbed.
- The level of noise is greater than that of the prior Nokian, but because the spikes in the older model were already "lying" (or had largely fled) by the time the new one was installed, I am unable to make a fair comparison with the new ones.
