
Cordiant Snow Cross 2 SUV 215/60 R17 100T winter Review
21
·
Average
Media




Description of Cordiant Snow Cross 2 SUV 215/60 R17 100T winter
- Price
- Balancing
- No
- They asked for a radius of 16 meters. They brought seventeen. They will accept returns of the items only if the customer brings them back himself to the store. Given that we paid for the delivery, those traveling from Volokolamsk to Domodedovo are responsible for transporting the wheels themselves.
- 1) Reasonably affordable 2) stability amidst the snow. 3) Does not make holes in the snow with his body
- 1) There is a low degree of lateral stability. 2) is unable to get out of the rut on the ice in a stable manner. 3) The quality does not conform to the norm.
- A remarkable achievement in "price-quality" balancing. A quality product that is reasonably priced.
- Noise.
- Nothing!
- One huge flaw
- The cost as well as the quality.
- Yes, it couldn't be better.
- Price fire. 12/08/2022 I purchased a set of 215/65/16 at a price of 4,270 for each individual component. Brand new, coming out in 2022. No run. You pay the same price for two cylinders as you do for one. On the fresh ground, one should exhibit positive behavior. I drove up a rolling hill, where I was under the impression that only four wheel drive could proceed. Spikes do not produce any audible effects in Mondeo 4.
- Hum. It is the hum, not the noise from the spikes, that is bothersome. On smooth asphalt, a resonant rumbling will commence in a straight line when the vehicle's speed increases from 58 to 62 kilometers per hour. The volume is not life-threatening, but if you do not have a radio, it stands out in contrast to the surrounding environment.
- Price
- It was discovered that one of the four wheels had a problem.
- Cheap, with a substantial tread depth and a large number of studs
- One of the wheels had a heavy balance, which was greater than 140 grams. Several times it was disassembled, and it was even tested on another disk.
- The spikes have been installed, and the sidewalls, according to what they appear to be writing, are now thicker. I am hopeful that this is the case, since the prior iteration of the Nokian Hakka had some type of (changed that year, I forget what it was) right front on the parebriki that eventually rubbed.
- The level of noise is greater than that of the prior Nokian, but because the spikes in the older model were already "lying" (or had largely fled) by the time the new one was installed, I am unable to make a fair comparison with the new ones.