Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Eh Wah Paw ᠌ photo
Bangkok
1 Level
121 Review
162 Karma

Review on πŸ“· Pentax 21870 DA 50-200mm F/4-5.6 AL All-Weather Resistant Lens by Eh Wah Paw ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Poor quality, not suitable for use.

In principle, glass for a C grade, at the short end, at ISO 800, back and forth. On a long faded and dark, well, this is for all zooms with variable aperture. In short, a clear picture cannot be achieved. Pentax zooms with a constant aperture are under 40,000, and you can’t find used ones. I’m shooting my child’s sports competitions in the pool with this lens, I have to raise the ISO to 6400 and shoot in a series in a ravine, the result is dumb. I have already come to the conclusion that it was necessary to take the Canon 650 and calmly buy used optics for it. I photographed both on shift, and on fad, and on amateur and on zenith, the film was maximum 100, but mostly 65. And the quality suited me. But Pentax upset, no, the carcass itself is good, I have a K30, but this cheap optics is a complete dreck, I screwed industrial and helios to the carcass, so they shoot super, but there is no autofocus, but it’s important for me for sports. The moral is this, it was necessary to take the canon.

Pros
  • Price
Cons
  • Picture quality