Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Hiral Kumar แ Œ photo
Delhi
1 Level
117 Review
172 Karma

Review on Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS Telephoto Zoom ๐Ÿ“ท Lens - International Version: Exceptional Image Stability & No Warranty by Hiral Kumar แ Œ

Revainrating 3 out of 5

In general, its pretty good, an equal number of pros and cons.

I used this "glass" (plastic) several times, I even thought of buying it for trips. I didn't buy it and don't regret it. Glass is worth its money if you buy it for little money up to 10,000 I used it several times for several days . A normal plastic device. Lightweight, comfortable. The range excludes universal use. As a universal traveler will not work . A wide angle is simply necessary. The stub works conditionally, but it works. The entire plastic budget series of glasses from Canon has similar stubs . For a year of active use, my friend (quite a neat person) has collected quite a lot of dust. Well, figs would be with her, the quality of the picture is not yet affected. Noisy, but rather frisky focus, the bayonet mount is plastic and is erased ! Downright funny. If you use the lens actively, then 3-4 years is enough. His picture is not bad, what to wish for such money, the quality and durability of Elka will definitely not be. I wanted to buy myself exclusively for trips, Iโ€™ll ruin it and Iโ€™m not sorry, I went to choose - each copy buzzes in its own way, they focus differently, the picture is different, the sharpness is random (no one will adjust this plastic miracle!). He is like that, about the fact that he is not full-frame, I will keep silent, such a miracle on a full frame, a mentally healthy person will not think of putting it. Colors are subject to editing, and it is better to shoot in ravik. I didnโ€™t use the polarizer, the front lens rotates, I didnโ€™t see the need to go out of my way about this. Bottom line: a very cheap TV set, not universal, but light and cheap . if you have more money, take something else . Well, there will be no high quality on such glass. Everything is plastic! And not very strong . Well, for starters, and so as not to be sorry if something completely comes down . I liked it by itself, I didnโ€™t buy it, because I have better (for quiet shooting) and universal (for travel) optics. All success!

Pros
  • Lightweight, cheap, not a pity at all. Like a stabilizer.
Cons
  • There is no wide angle at all . Plastic is all around both inside and outside, conditionally working stab . Unstable quality, each copy is a "thing in itself" . There is no lens hood and it is not clear how to put it on. Not full-frame (technical characteristic), itโ€™s stupid to talk about the ultrasonic motor on this miracle at all.

Comments (1)

Please, sign in to write a comment
October 28, 2022
Bought two months ago, using with Canon EOS 400D. I like to photograph all living creatures and flowers, people from afar, so I am very pleased.