Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Park Seo Jun photo
1 Level
106 Review
114 Karma

Review on Smartphone HUAWEI P20 Lite 4/64 GB, black by Park Seo Jun

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Impressions from the purchase are good, buy.

In overall, the phone is satisfactory provided you do not place a high priority on the quality of the camera or the fingerprint scanner. Other from that, there are no issues with how things function. Many advantages: - A high-quality, large, bright screen with a high resolution (although it is unclear why such a screen is required, other than for virtual reality; however, it is undoubtedly fashionable). - The device does not have particularly enormous dimensions considering the size of the diagonal screen. The back cover is quite stunning, and it even comes with a transparent silicone casing that wraps around it completely. - Connectivity. There were never any issues, and the only place where connectivity was lost was in the subway, and even then it was infrequent. Support for Voice over LTE and Voice over WiFi was included in the most recent version of ate; perhaps this will be helpful to someone. - Quick, does not freeze, does not twitch, scrolling is always smooth, and there is sufficient RAM to prevent applications from being unloaded from memory even if there are not a very large number of them. - The sound produced by the speaker is loud. Although it is possible to find devices with a louder output for the same price, the sound produced by this speaker is so abundant that it is difficult to miss even in an extremely noisy environment. - Many people won't be able to tell the difference at all between the sound quality of the headphones and that of an affordable player equipped with a dedicated DAC, at least when compared to the sound quality of the headphones. - Use of Force. I don't really play video games; instead, I spend the majority of my time reading the news online (about 1.5 hours per day), listening to music while driving (about 3 hours per day), making phone calls, and chatting on instant messengers. By the time 9 p.m. rolls around, my phone has about 40% of its charge remaining. A quick charger is included in this package. - The EMUI shell, in my experience, provides a high level of usability. A further advantage is that the device has both USB-C and 3.5mm connectors. Another advantage is that NFC is available. (Rereads and restocks the Troika card) Does have a few drawbacks. - A unibrow may be undesirable to certain people; however, it is possible to "eliminate" it by adjusting the parameters. - You can purchase glass with a black frame, but this same frame will slightly reduce the visible area of the screen, by approximately 0.5 millimeters on each side. This is because the screen has a rounded perimeter, which means that if you try to stick ordinary glass on the edges, it will not adhere to the screen. In my opinion, it's not very good. - Fingerprint sensor. Here, in the reviews written by those who have owned the product for less than a month, it is said that the fingerprint identification is of high quality and operates very quickly. It was like that with me at first, but then for some reason the sensor started functioning less and less effectively. As a consequence, after seven months, it probably only works once out of every thirty times now. As a result, we are able to conclude that it is completely ineffective (and this is given that the finger and the scanner are clean and dry). After reading the discussion on this gadget in the 4pda forum, I came to the conclusion that I am not the only person who owns it. Obviously, there is also face recognition, but it is important to keep in mind that, for example, Apple developed a specialized scanner for the Face ID function, but here everything is much more straightforward and just uses the typical selfie camera. When you supposedly "scan" your face, it will tell you that the accuracy of this method is not particularly great, and there is a possibility that your security will be compromised. Nonetheless, I believe the camera to be the most significant drawback. It's possible that the sensor works well, but for whatever reason, they decided without adding any kind of stability to it. That is to say, even if you are not planning to take any "creative" photographs or films and are instead only intending to utilize the camera for work, you will still run into this issue. Taking a picture of the text in the room lighting often turns out about a third time, otherwise everything is blurry, or at dusk it is also very difficult to take a picture of a Christmas tree in garlands, and the inscription "fix the device to increase clarity" will also appear, but there is no clarity. Alternatively, taking a picture of the text in the room lighting often turns out about a third time, otherwise everything is blurry. It's true that even in broad daylight on the street, the images can come out a little grainy at times. The video will appear as though the operator has Parkinson's disease or chronic drunkenness since it will be filled with solid twitches. There remains a question as to why the camera stabilizer was not included on the device, which originally had a price tag of twenty dollars.

Similar reviews