Review on 🧹 Dyson Cordless Animal Rechargeable Vacuum Cleaner by Dana Popa ᠌

1. The charge begins, but the hand becomes tired of dragging it back and forth, and even the back starts to consider "why not whine":)) 2. The vacuum cleaner is awkward to grip and requires constant finger pressure to turn on. It also weighs the entire vacuum in your hand. Was it really that tough to make a hole in ANY other place on the handle, body, or stick? This is normally out of my comfort zone. 3. I'll be honest, nothing. Parents have a basic, old Samsung, so dust and wool are already dragged in at a distance of 10 cm from the brush. And not only should this one be placed near the trash, but you should also convince it to go in and shift the brush around! in standard mode and with the tank empty! 4. Quickly remove the brush and use a pipe to enter the space under the sofa. It wasn't there, but the pipe has a large, non-removable ring. There are nozzles, but I find it to be quite inconvenient to hook them up separately for each crack. It is also completely absurd to vacuum the entire flat before running back along the same path to vacuum the cracks. time wastage. 5. The turbo brush stopped spinning after 6 months and broke. 6. The vacuum cleaner itself started out by saying "uuu. uuu. uuu," then it stopped. simply put, die. In general, it was designed to be as small and fit inside Korean apartments as feasible rather than to be powerful. Which does not take up any space but just requires 20 to 30 minutes to clean the eyes, and you can give up the motor's power. Turbobrush—to make up for a mediocre motor in some way. Then the marketing starts, telling you that the brush was the catalyst and that it was the only tool necessary to collect all pet hair:)))) In other words, don't be duped. The vacuum is flimsy, unpredictable, and uncomfortable. For a 2022, what is typical for a Korean is a waste of money.