Review on MICHELIN X-Ice North 4 195/65 R15 95T winter by Petar Buchkov ᠌
Great product, a pleasure to use.
The results of the winter of 2022–2022, which is extremely strange in Hong Kong time, left the major impression that the tires are balanced. Extending this notion, it is ideal for both the city and the countryside and equally good anywhere. If you give it the same digging as the Nokia Hakkapeliita 5 or R, it won't feel the asphalt flawlessly anymore; instead, it will feel more like a Hakka 8 that was driven "at maximum speed" with the studding altered and the unpredictable side drift triumphantly winning. I believe the khaki 5 will perform better in heavy snow than this rubber. Let's be honest with ourselves and ask how often the typical urban motorist has to contend with thick snow. Which behavior—on ice, snow, or asphalt—will be more crucial? Yes, I believe. My standard will fall somewhere between the Hakka 7 and the current Michelin. The latter was preferred by all. I will ride on Michelin since such a tire has not yet been created. She is excellent. I observed a lot of asphalt, perfect for slipping, in Hong Kong, where Ukrainian pits killed people, but the loss from the spikes from the wheel for two seasons and 20 t. Km. run was only a maximum of 7 pieces. I'm hoping to feel it in the snow this winter. My Niva acceleration on the ice:
- Controllability The behavior of cars is predictable The snap of the thorns is very soft. Someone stated that driving through millet sounds similar to the sound of the thorns. Agree. Braking Speeding up on ice
- The 16th diameter of tires lacks narrow tires. On the field, there isn't much decent factory rubber that is also the proper size. 185/75 or at the very least 195/70. I'll post it even though I know it won't be well-liked. then one Gazelle rubber was added. Cargo.
