For FF: Sharp from 1.2 in the center, sharp around f/4 at the edges. I took it instead of 135/2, which I have already regretted several times. IMHO his tasks: - full-length and half-length portraits, in which he shows himself very well; - shooting in low light. An example of my use of this lens is here: Got pros: Aperture, color reproduction, high contrast, good (but not perfect bokeh), low HA level. Compared to 50 / 1.2L, it is noticeably sharper at all apertures. Some cons: VERY slow (I have II version) - suitable only for leisurely portrait shooting. (due to its slowness and low depth of field, I can hardly shoot small children) Up to f / 2.8, the edge of the frame is soapy (for portraits outside the studio, this can be a minus). IMHO, it is not suitable for a facial portrait in any way (the focal length is not right, itβs still better to take a fix of 200 / 2.8 for these purposes). Minus in bokeh - "cuts" the glare. Personally, I really don't like it. The main disadvantage, however, is the price.
Nikon 35mm f/1.8G Auto Focus Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras - Black (Model 2183)
125 Review
New Nikon 18-105mm Vibration Reduction π· Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLRs
104 Review
Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Lens - Fixed Black (6310B002) for US Cameras
76 Review
π· Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Lens with Auto Focus: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras
76 Review