Canon EF 85mm f1.2L II USM 📷 Lens: Perfect for Canon DSLR Cameras - Fixed-Focus Excellence Review

Just for the sake of working with this lens, I left one system for Kenon. Yes, working with old nickels, I encountered some difficulties in using this lens. But with the advent of mirrorless cameras, having bought an Eos R for yourself, many of the disadvantages are in the past. This is my favorite and most expensive lens.

For FF: Sharp from 1.2 in the center, sharp around f/4 at the edges. I took it instead of 135/2, which I have already regretted several times. IMHO his tasks: - full-length and half-length portraits, in which he shows himself very well; - shooting in low light. An example of my use of this lens is here: Got pros: Aperture, color reproduction, high contrast, good (but not perfect bokeh), low HA level. Compared to 50 / 1.2L, it is noticeably sharper at all apertures. Some cons: VERY slow…

Great lens and my favorite focal length. My first glass from canon, which, when adjusted, showed that it does not need additional add-ons. I also have a 135 2.0l that I bought a year earlier, many are trying tocommpare them - on my own I will say 135 worthy glass, previously I shot 80% of the shooting on the street with it, now this percentage falls on 85-ku as a more universal glass wider possibilities. Regarding the speed of autofocus, people are mostly dissatisfied with what they don’t…

Was bought after using 70-200 2.8, I realized that 70-200 glass is more for work, excellent glass but a bit boring, although I won’t give it away, only if I change it to 70-200 2.8 is ii, if I understand that it’s really better. Now about the distant and mysterious eighty-five In the store I chose from three glasses. So: the first glass, as I understand it, the sellers have been trying to sell for a long time, there is a small lead dot on the inner lens, perhaps this does not affect the image…

A true unsurpassed masterpiece of optics. Its purpose - a portrait lens - justifies by 150%. I use it mainly when shooting women's and children's portraits. Compared it with its progenitor - Canon FD 85mm f/1.2L I think that the modern version is slightly, but better The lens is not suitable for dynamic scenes - it focuses slowly. But it focuses very accurately.

I'll try to form an objective essment. 1. Do we need f/1.2? In film times, this was ofcomurse more relevant. But, aperture does not happen much, in any case. The only thing I don’t advise is to shoot outdoors where it’s inappropriate, i. E. in sunny weather, in fact, only for the sake of shooting outdoors. Because in the picture we get fragments with a purple border - transverse XA. Especially incomntrasting areas (white with black). By the way, the same thing can be observed on other fixes…

changed focal lengths from 135 to 85 and 50 to 35. at 85, in principle, you can generally shoot everything without forgetting to tighten the hole. someone writes they say that at 1.2 the sharpness is bad, , it’s not bad sharpness, but an extremely shallow depth of field and by tightening the aperture, little changes (except for even sharper, clearer frames), you need to take this fact into account (download a flu calculator on your phone, you will understand everything). by the way, the magic…

The lens is praised as an excellent portrait lens, but its capabilities are much wider. Being a week in Venice, I decided to devote the whole day to this lens. All day long, without taking off, I walked around the city with him. The result surprised and delighted me! Here are some photos showing its capabilities. ? page=0 ? page=0 ? page=3 ? page=3 After that day, I just rediscovered this lens! And now I will put it much more often.

Pros: Aperture, sharp, there are aspherical elements in the optical design. Cons below: Plastic, constructive like a whale lens. Slow autofocus. Chromatic aberrations. Insanely expensive for the above disadvantages.

With its pros. There is nothing better to take 135L and the price is acceptable and the quality Some cons: The price is too high! The case is fragile. free access for dust and moisture

Has pros: Good lens, but not sharp. Suitable pros. Canon EF 85 f / 1.8 with 2.0 is not inferior to him in anything. Checked. Determine the differences difficult. Has some cons The price is doubled. Slow autofocus. Heavy. The quality is inferior to other lenses, even from the Canon line. Not great.

Even if someone finds the content of my review to be contradictory, I simply cannot refrain from writing what I have to say about this model. The scream of the heart, in a manner of speaking. Because I rented it to try it out first, it's in almost brand-new condition. Sadly, I came to the realization that I have a number of fundamental flaws in myself. I don't argue, yes, of course everything is subjective, and it's possible that my hands are crooked, but even so. It's possible that I came…

The primary opening in this itty-bitty thing is not, in fact, one of them. The drawing is the most important part. Before deciding to purchase one, I tried out a lens by renting one first. In point of fact, those who are skeptical should choose this testing alternative since it makes the most sense. I made up my mind to buy it after learning that it is perfectly acceptable for them to photograph not only portraits but also the entirety of an event such as a wedding. In general, my viewpoint…

When I first got it, I put it through certain tests, and the results showed that it had a good degree of sharpness. The focus is typical. They were able to scare off a little HA on an open hole, but this is still a feature of the model and not an incident! As I was shopping, one of my greatest concerns was that I would be misled in my expectations during actual use, and not during the testing phase. Uncertainty and skepticism were left behind after the very first session. I was taken aback by…

Please find 2 photos I have attached. Now, that's nonsense; the lens can produce some really neat effects. (natural light from the balcony's windows on a rainy day) ISO 125 1/1.2 photograph

I purposefully left one system for Kenon to use with this lens. There were challenges in using this lens while dealing with vintage nickels. But now that you own an Eos R, you can put those concerns to rest, as many of the drawbacks no longer apply to mirrorless cameras. My go-to and most costly lens.

Perhaps the most controversial glass from Kenon. Even after a year of use it is difficult to write an objective review. It seems that there are no sensible pluses and there are many minuses. But nevertheless, it was this lens that fell in love with most of all and, despite all the "buts", became a "staff member". Has pros: I won’t talk about aperture, colors, sharpness, drawing. Here and so everything is clear and repeated many times. Very precise focus. Misses are possible if the hand or…

As soon as this glass is on the camera and you start shooting, that's it - there is no other alternative! The question arises: where to put all the other lenses now? :) (Shuuuutka) Some pros: The colors are unreal - like on a medium slide format. Sharpness rings like a razor. Backgrounds are blurred - just a picture. Incredible glass - the best, even in the L range. The most-presame portrait painter, without any BUT. Its cons: Well. the price, of course. Although this quality can not be…

This is my most favorite lens. The things that the 85 does, no other lens does. Colors, sharpness, bokeh - just a fairy tale for those who shoot portraits. I shoot in conjunction with mark 4, I'm happy as an elephant.

Specially attached 2 pictures. What nonsense - the lens can make a cool picture. (lighting through the window on a cloudy day + glazed balcony) Picture 1.2 iso 125