I like that you can run several tests at once so it saves time when doing analysis for multiple parts in one project- however this does not always work well and sometimes results are incorrect which causes problems during reporting back up/correction stage.- some functions do seem very slow (I assume because they were written before modern computers).
You have to know how exactly what data will be generated from your test plan if using ENgage plus correctly otherwise unexpected errors may occur - also make sure what parameters should actually go into calculation process such as temperature etc.. It's great having lots more choice about testing equipment than previously available but there could certainly use improvement especially around automation & ease of setting things out properly. We used engagedplus for our calibration programme where we took 3 different probes through an entire life cycle over 2 years period under various conditions; This enabled us track performance changes both long term within components then compare them across.