Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Micha Pirecki ᠌ photo
1 Level
339 Review
0 Karma

Review on πŸ“± Fully Unlocked Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 256GB Renewed - Aura Glow Silver by Micha Pirecki ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The quality is fine, it's fine to use.

It should come as no surprise that the smartphone in question is not worth the amount of money being asked for it. This option was made available to me at the Samsung store where official merchandise is sold, and its price came to 110,000 won. I owned the Hong Kong edition of the 855 snap, which gave me access to 512 gigabytes of storage capacity and allowed me to use two SIM cards simultaneously. Additional information regarding the functionality of the touchscreen on the screen: Touchable display screen Because of this, you are required to handle the phone in a manner that calls for some degree of caution or some other activity, which is bothersome due to the fact that the phone runs in a manner that is somewhat atypical in comparison to the iPhone. There are a lot of clicks that aren't meant to be made on the screen, and you inadvertently launch a wide array of applications on a regular basis. In general, I am able to write quite a lot; nevertheless, the space that has been allotted to me in this article is insufficient to cover all of the possible subjects that I could write about. I was left with the feeling that I had been misled, and that was the end of it; that was the impression that was left with me. It turned out that I didn't need to try to get my hands on a Samsung, therefore I never actually had one of those devices in my possession. When I called the Samsung representative office and asked what the secret was with the camera, they followed up by asking if I would suggest Samsung technology to the people I know. As a direct consequence of this, I won't be recommending this tool to any of my close associates or members of my family at any point in the foreseeable future. I am unable to provide any kind of assessment of the standard of Samsung's hardware in general. (I hope that each of you is successful.)

Pros
  • 1. Screen. It contains hues that are luscious, bright, and wonderful to look at. 2. An increase in the battery's charge. My equipment delivered consistent results throughout the full day of strenuous activity (including calls, games, and instant messengers). 3. Camera. When it comes to photographing images, the daytime light in Shirik is just breathtaking. In addition to that, the video stabilization is excellent. 4. The music that is being played by the stereo speakers is loud, but it is neither louder nor clearer than the music that is being played by the iPhone 8 Plus that I am simultaneously using. 5. I would like to express my gratitude for the high-quality film that was already attached to the glass when I purchased it. I was able to save time and money by not having to apply the film myself. A huge thank you is also in order for the complimentary silicone case that was sent. 6. The inclusion of an E-Pen in a smartphone is certainly not an extra feature that might be considered superfluous; in point of fact, if all smartphones included this function, it would be required. For example, the mobile version of Lightroom that you use to edit images has an interface that makes it difficult to change the sliders with your finger to the numbers that you want. However, when you make use of this instrument, things get a great deal less complicated. As a consequence of this, Japanese scanwords associated with him have recently started to become increasingly significant to me.
Cons
  • 1. Screen. Screen shim, which is also referred to as flickering, is something that is discussed by all tech bloggers, whether they are paid to do so or not, and I agree with what they say about it. 2. Camera. Whenever I'm in this area, I can't help but feel like someone is trying to take advantage of me. I am an avid photographer, so I use the camera on my phone very frequently. I also edit the photographs I capture on my phone, so having a good camera on my phone is really important to me. To my surprise, however, I found that the images shot with the laptop were not much better than the photos taken with my older iPhone 8+, and that in low-light situations, the iPhone turned out to be even better, especially in terms of the detail it captured. This revelation took me by surprise. Due to the fact that I am a passionate photographer and take images using my phone on a regular basis, the camera is very significant to me. In low light, Samsung's camera basically obliterates some details by using noise reduction, and the ultimate result is like some kind of soap. Everywhere you go, people are praising its camera, and both the presentation and the evaluations of this smartphone (which appear to have been paid for) acclaim it. The presentation will shed light on this particular piece of information for you. They also brought it out during the introduction that, according to Deixomark, the camera on this smartphone received the highest possible score. And now I have a question: what... iPhone, which has previously been available for purchase for two years, takes better images than the flagship laptop that was just recently announced?... What are the chances of something like that occurring? They tell us from the stage that we are the best, they exhibit pictures that were taken by a professional camera),)), and they mention to publications such as Deixomark, but here it is. In point of fact, in light of all that's been said, I believe that Samsung and Deixomark are both just different kinds of liars.) Despite your best efforts, they are impossible to deceive. Especially when one takes into account the price of the smartphone, which is 110 thousand dollars. Where does this lead? 3. The inflection or pitch of the speaker's voice when they are delivering their message. There is something odd about this circumstance; there is not enough of a volume margin. For example, you have to listen to the person you are chatting with while driving a car, despite the fact that the noise level is already very high. This is despite the fact that there is not enough of a volume margin. How so? When playing music, the same speaker is quite loud; nevertheless, when acting as a hearing aid when chatting on the phone, its volume at maximum in a noisy environment is not sufficient, in contrast to the volume at maximum on the same iPhone 8+. 4. I can say the same thing with the speakerphone mode, which is that the interlocutor, in order to hear what he is broadcasting there, sometimes you have to listen, while the iPhone bellows, as if it were not in itself.