Review on Cordiant Snow Cross 2 SUV 235/55 R17 103T winter by Petar Velinov ᠌

In December, when I tried to buy what I wanted, prices had gone up by a thousand and a half, so I had to take it. Uncertain protection. Accepted her because she was so honest. It's great at dragging the car through deep snow, doesn't burrow too much, and always ends up in front, even if snow builds up behind it. The drawbacks will now be discussed. When the drifting effects of traveling faster than 55 mph in light, wet snow first become noticeable, the gas is smoothly released. Racers should not use tires, then. Leaving an ice rut is not a stable, instantaneous process; the ice does not hold on the ridge and slides back. Checking for the absence of ice on the ice could be difficult. The effectiveness of aqua planning is still unproven. They don't want to acknowledge their marriage since one tire frequently goes flat, despite having it fixed at a tire shop. External evidence suggests that the sensor did not notably initiate the drop. In overall, I am pleased with the tire; its cross-country capability is its main selling point for me, and it has the added benefit of not becoming instantly buried in snow, unlike my prior tires. Second-season operations require a size 2156516 shoe. System dastr.