Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Dwii Sara Agung แ Œ photo
1 Level
112 Review
79 Karma

Review on ๐Ÿ“ท Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm F4.0-5.6 II Lens - Comprehensive Review and Best Deals by Dwii Sara Agung แ Œ

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

For a long time I did not dare to write a review after the purchase, although it would seem that the lens is here: take pictures for joy, compare, do not limit yourself to focal lengths. A lens for enthusiasts, not for an idle layman who opens a shelf with a camera once every half a year. If you attach this lens to the camera, then the total weight of the handbag will significantly increase in weight: a bottle of lemonade or a loaf of bread, for example, will no longer be enough for the photographer. Only a camera. Thus, it is only for men, well, or emancipated women. I have no idea why he was photographed for a year without enthusiasm, probably because it is really infrequent, and rare photo shoots did not provide enough material for the accumulation of positive experience. It seemed that the camera was slowly focusing, misses, and the pictures turn out blurry. And second, the picture is not wow. And there is no time to understand this. I didnโ€™t understand at 45-150, I attached it and took a photo, which is why I like the Olympus brand, which I strongly advertise. It was worth going to more or less mass events on fine May days - well, this is a miracle! Yes, I realized that on my pl7, you need to wait for sharpness, and not press the button hoping that the photo will aim itself (at maximum zoom) - all the details are worked out to the smallest detail, as if itโ€™s not a zoom (on the street and not in the dark) Well, the picture turned out to be pretty good. If you have a micro, then the lens is a must-buy, all sorts of 14-45 there, pampering. And, frankly, it's flawed. I donโ€™t attach photos, because after the closure of photos, Iโ€™m not entirely positive about this resource. But for amateurs and professionals, I will say that Dmitry Krupsky's review is quite consistent with reality. As for the fact that it is dark - on the street this is complete nonsense, and even indoors any grain is not so noticeable, but there is a full-fledged frame. Taking this opportunity - a resolution of 16 megapixels, it works fine, fuji or Sony with their system bricks without such a lens rest on the sidelines, and even more so for mirrors.

Pros
  • All his. Not a lens - a gift.
Cons
  • Moment about weight. But without this, probably nowhere - the equipment is serious after all, not some kind of trinket.