Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
📷 olympus m.zuiko digital ed 14-150mm f4.0-5.6 ii lens - comprehensive review and best deals logo

📷 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm F4.0-5.6 II Lens - Comprehensive Review and Best Deals Review

7

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.5
👓 Lenses, 📷 Camera & Photo

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(2)
img 1 attached to 📷 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm F4.0-5.6 II Lens - Comprehensive Review and Best Deals
img 2 attached to 📷 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm F4.0-5.6 II Lens - Comprehensive Review and Best Deals

Photos by authors

(2)
img 3 attached to 📷 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm F4.0-5.6 II Lens - Comprehensive Review and Best Deals
img 4 attached to 📷 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm F4.0-5.6 II Lens - Comprehensive Review and Best Deals

Details

BrandOlympus
Lens TypeWide Angle, Telephoto
Compatible MountingsMicro Four Thirds
Camera Lens Description150 millimetres
Maximum Focal Length150 Millimeters

Description of 📷 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm F4.0-5.6 II Lens - Comprehensive Review and Best Deals

Dustproof and splash proof. Minimum focusing distance : 20 inches, Focal Length : 14-150 millimeter. Zuiko Extra-low reflection optical coating. 28-300 millimeter 35 millimeter equivalent, Compatible with all micro four thirds cameras. Comes with lens hood (LH-61C), lens cap, rear lens cap. Angle of view : 75° - 8.2°.Lens Construction:15 elements in 11 groups.

Reviews

Global ratings 7
  • 5
    4
  • 4
    2
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

I took this lens with the E-M5 MK2 on purpose, because I didn’t want to carry 3 lenses - wide, medium zoom and telephoto. As a result, I have this hyperzoom, which is both wide and telephoto at the same time. For portraits and shooting indoors, I bought a 25mm fix. These two lenses are enough for me for almost all occasions in my travels. In the photo - ladies at 150mm, swans at 14mm.

Pros
  • An extremely versatile lens that covers a lot of focal lengths, which is why it becomes a staffer that you want to shoot only when you need aperture. The waterproof housing and lens hood included allow you to shoot in light rain. In conditions of good light and skillful hands, it can be a makrik. Very pleasant to the touch, because of what they want and want to use.
Cons
  • At the far end, although the contrast drops, you have to pay for versatility.

In general, the lens is worth its money (see note above), you can safely take it to nature. Although the long end, of course, as always, is not enough when shooting distant objects (birds, the Moon, and the like :)). Suitable for shooting indoors, but with a very good flash (I used the FL-50R, but so far, not all shots are good either). P. S. I am not a photographer, therefore, knowledgeable people, especially those who did not like my review or my opinion, please write comments, I will read…

Pros
  • I really liked the versatility of the lens. Aperture sufficient for shooting nature in the daytime. There is nothing to do indoors without a flash (if you raise the ISO then it’s sad because of the pink dots on the faces, although maybe I don’t know how to cook the E-M5 II). Pretty compact. The size is not much larger than 12-50. Price. From the hands you can buy for 12-15K. I personally would not buy a new one for 40, taking instead 12-200 for a little more money.
Cons
  • For some reason, autofocus is often mistaken. The firmware in both the lens and the camera is the latest. Olympus E-M5 II camera. Tracking focus is generally something with something - when shooting a video, you can easily get a few blurry seconds. Once (although it seems to have already been a camera problem), having lost focus and trying to return it for a long time, the camera simply rebooted O_o. From 12-50, 12-40, 14-45 (Panasonic) I did not notice such problems.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, glad I found this product.

Took a few shots to understand the power of the zoom outdoors and from a 9th floor window. I photographed the duck already at sunset. In general, OMD EM10 allows you to take blurry pictures at maximum zoom. I didn’t think that the stabilization would cope, but there were no problems, I even shot a video, without shaking at all. Has some pros Well, I really liked it - a new experience for me is such a zoom, I thought it was useless and very niche, but firstly there is a wide angle, and the zoom…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

For a long time I did not dare to write a review after the purchase, although it would seem that the lens is here: take pictures for joy, compare, do not limit yourself to focal lengths. A lens for enthusiasts, not for an idle layman who opens a shelf with a camera once every half a year. If you attach this lens to the camera, then the total weight of the handbag will significantly increase in weight: a bottle of lemonade or a loaf of bread, for example, will no longer be enough for the…

Pros
  • All his. Not a lens - a gift.
Cons
  • Moment about weight. But without this, probably nowhere - the equipment is serious after all, not some kind of trinket.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, I liked the product, I bought it for a reason.

I like to shoot at 100-150mm and capture details. I have a very sharp specimen 40-150 4-5.6. When buying, I expected that it would be possible not to change the Shirik TV all the time. But I was wrong. This is a comparison of my specimens, but at focal lengths of 100-150mm, a 40-150 lens gives a better picture by the head. The wide ones are great. Compare with sigma 30mm 1.4, panasonic 14mm 2.5, oly 9-18

Pros
  • Very versatile Extremely well put together. Moisture protection. Blenda. Sharp at wide angles
Cons
  • Disgusting sharpness and contrast at 100-150mm

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, but I expected a little more.

I took it only because with em5-3 in the whale I went for only 15 thousand. I wanted a television range for birds, but in this regard, he greatly disappointed me, since the quality suffers noticeably at the long end. The picture with it is close to the phone, and the difference comes down to the fact that you have a lot of twists on the camera and a wide range of focal lengths with the same quality. I see no reason to leave it, I will sell

Pros
  • Versatile, lightweight, protected, small for such a range of focal lengths.
Cons
  • Lacks sharpness, especially at 100+mm. At the same time, if the focus object is close, then even more or less, and when focusing on infinity, frank soap, you will not shoot a landscape in a high-quality position in the body position. Pictures with it are paradoxically noisier than with fixes at the same absolute settings. One gets the feeling that the manufacturer, knowing the weak optical qualities of the lens, decided to cheat, and sewed automatic sharpening into the carcass - this is where noise comes in where it should not be (up to ISO 200). The picture is kind of flat, the colors are not very (compared to fixes)