Review on Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM by Agata Michalak ᠌

Throughout the time that I was making use of it, the idea of selling it never crossed my mind. As though I had made an effort to uncover flaws in it myself. I looked for it and was successful. But I always made sure to take a step back and give it a fair assessment. And each time I came to the realization that it was something I required. pretty practical for me in terms of focus lengths. It's a good location for shooting reportage. This is significant to me on a personal level. "razor-sharp" clarity and "juiciness" of the image. And all of this is due to the absence of Photoshop there. (But as of right now, there is, which is sad). Nonetheless, the most advanced technology is used for everything there. My impression is that this lens was designed, from the very beginning, with effectiveness and dependability in mind. Those who believe that the picture produced by a 24-105 and a lens that is not an L-series lens is identical are also correct in their assessment. There is a distinction to be made. When it comes to the overall picture quality, repairs are, without a doubt, superior. And if you don't intend to shoot anything else but portraits, then you should definitely bring along a 13.5 mm L lens. They are comparable in price to one another. Yet, the effectiveness of this lens is something that I place a high priority on, and it is from these vantage points that I evaluate it. Those individuals who were overly concerned with the clarity and vibrancy of the colors did a disservice. if you look at it from the standpoint of a tool. If you have viewed a sufficient number of websites with photographs on which photoshop has been used as the only editing tool, you will start to evaluate his work. If that's the case, you probably won't enjoy 135 mm L either.