Review on OpenAI ChatGPT by Alex Meshceryakov

Hello dear readers, I want to say right away that we will talk about the world-famous AI ChatGPT and their creators OpenAI. When I first visited the site, I was a little surprised, it’s certainly a matter of taste, but as for me, the design is a little strange, even a little inappropriate, on the other hand, it gives uniqueness to the project and it’s not appreciated at all for the beauty of the pages, let’s be honest. You can sign up for the platform with your Google, Microsoft, and Apple account, or simply by regular mail, which many will find more reliable. Such a variety of variations is very similar to what has already been done, for example, on the Revain.org platform, it's great that the guys are not standing still. I found the first interactions with AI very fun until I got used to working with it. Sometimes I got good answers, sometimes not so much. But then I realized that chatGPT is just T9 from the phone, but as if pumped on the best protein in the world, the engineers call both of these technologies "language models" and all they do is guess what the next word should come after text already available. T9 in a smartphone and ChatGPT are trained to solve up to one simple task: predicting a single next word. All this is language modeling - when, based on some existing text, a conclusion is made about what should be written next. It is important that this is what ChatGPT started with, but now it is a complex mechanism, which is basically just a way of issuing optimal and "chewed" information, but it's cool to be able to quickly get the information you need, on the other hand, it impairs personality processes in humans, such as thinking, information seeking, and imagination. A good example would be books, first we read the books, then we listened to them, then we read a brief retelling, and now you can ask the trained machine what is the point and who are the main characters, and yes, in this case you will know the end result that should have been directed the work of your brain, but this work was not done, as a result you did not get the opportunity to think. And tons of essays with which such technology filled up teachers in schools and institutes, this is a separate topic for conversation. Also, I want to tell my readers in advance that, according to my experiments, the technology has not passed many tests for logic and imagination (surprise, the machine does not have them), so if you are not doing extremely low-intellectual work, but even with a drop of art, you have nothing worry, all AI generations are just competently made selections from the results of the work of other people, which means that if we humans do not generate content, then machines will not develop either, because they are clearly assigned to the movement of the development of thought of all mankind, thank you all for read my review dear friends, I hope you stop worrying that the machine will take away your work!