Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 96
  • 5
    73
  • 4
    17
  • 3
    6
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

Here, I've heard from a number of people that the box cooler makes a lot of noise. After I had purchased it, I immediately activated it. It was nearly dangerous to be around him because of how much he squealed. After that, I had the notion, "Is it really adm, a huge manufacturer cannot produce a typical branded cooler? It is improbable," thus I began to doubt that statement. As a direct consequence of the settings. When you power on the computer, the sound of the cooler is simply not present…

Pros
  • The relationship between cost and benefit
Cons
  • We were unable to find it.

The CPU is one dangerous device! Much superior to any intelligence! All of the races are played at top speed! It is a waste of money to purchase a really strong percentage (and if it crashes, it's simply because the operating system and the game are incompatible with one another). When set to highest graphics, Grand Theft Auto 4's performance never exceeds an average of 50% (1 core 70%, 2 core 40%, 3 core 50%, and 4 core 40%). In addition here on CRYSIS AT THE MAXIMUM. When using a water…

Pros
  • WHAT YOU NEED IN TERMS OF POWER FOR GAMES! FROSTY COMING FROM AMD!
Cons
  • does not exist

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The goods are normal, money is not wasted!

Its pros: chases up to 3.2 without problems, with Cooler Master GeminII (RR-CCH-ANU2-GP) temperature max 42deg. in any tests, at room temperature 24 deg. Got cons: not full cache (kills 1% of production), overclocking above 3.2 requires experience in this matter.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

Even at 3.7 GHz, it is stable for 1 hour of Linpak testing; nonetheless, it has been decreased to 3.6 GHz just in case. At 3.8, the exam had already provided an incorrect response, probably during the ninth minute. Everything is at 1.265 volts at this point. While increasing the voltage makes sense in the extra, I didn't even bother trying to find the overclocking ceiling using that method. At high performance, I don't observe any heat dissipation taking place. I also increased the memory…

Pros
  • I traded an Athlon II x4 620 along with 4 GB of RAM of consumer-grade quality to acquire it. The C3 revision (125 W). It transpired that it did not dissipate heat any hotter than Athlone did; so, I reduced the voltage to 1.265 V and increased the overclocking to 3.6 GHz.
Cons
  • The temperature does not stay within 62 degrees even when the box cooler is operating at its nominal frequency, and it creates a lot of noise. As a result, I installed the reliable Titan for five hundred dollars.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Overall good, but expected more.

If you don't plan on adding any further features, then the best selection for a home computer will be able to handle any task, and you will be able to play anything (of course, this is contingent on the rest of the hardware being able to support it). This one is the best option! Personally, of course, I was quite disappointed; I expected more; I raced to take the position because there were no finances for Intel at the time; additionally, I didn't want to wait a month and a half; my impatience…

Pros
  • It does not have any unique advantages; the only one is that it chases well, which is why it is the ideal processor for the typical user and will pull everything.
Cons
  • enormous cost! a piece of masonry for the cost of a diamond! Nothing at all would be possible without overclocking! 4 turtle cores!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

Excellent gaming computer for a very reasonable price. Those who enjoy "overclocking" now have something to keep them occupied in their spare time. I set the Noctua NH-C12P SE14 cooler to this %, and I immediately felt relieved. At 1200 rpm, the temperature is 38–39 degrees while the engine is idling, but it rises to 54–61 degrees when heavy loads are applied. I didn't bother overclocking my computer since it's not necessary, but also because doing so isn't that interesting. If you are a fan of

Pros
  • Excellent performance at a reasonable price, 4 cores, a free multiplier, compatibility with AM3 and AM2+, DDR2 and DDR3 memory, and a host of other features. A decently efficient computer processor overall.
Cons
  • Stone is extremely hot, yet this is not a significant drawback to the regular cooling process. Cooler: The packaged cooler needs to be discarded right away or given to someone who owns a computer with a processor that is less powerful than an Athlon II x4 620 running at 2.60 GHz. It is simply impossible to put up with this cooler's roar; it appears to be on the verge of rupturing into pieces. This cooler is very loud. It is unable to complete the work that has been given to it, and when it is not in use, it can reach temperatures of 48 to 57 degrees Celsius, even though the cooler itself can rotate at speeds of 5200 to 6800 revolutions per minute. 0 o And what occurs when the load has been applied? I did not have the courage to load the percentage with a boxed cooler, so I went out and bought another CO right away.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend.

Has pros: Good speed, you can’t load the maximum, it accelerates well (take stronger RAM for overclocking) Different cons: The 6144kb cache on the core i7 950 is larger, but it is correspondingly faster, it heats up but not so much.

Pros: Good stone for funny money. 95W - cold, even under a linpak up to a critical temperature margin> 15 degrees Some cons: Given the order of prices for Phenom II on the secondary, it still makes sense to aim at x6 - plus 2 cores after all

The core speed of my AMD Phenom II X4 925 machine is 2.8 gigahertz per core. I did this at the beginning of 2022 with a computer. Of course, the i7 is not a rival to the aforementioned CPUs and should not be compared to them in the context of contemporary processors like the Core i5, AMD's Phenom II X4 Black Deneb (earlier version), AMD FX, or Intel's Xeon processors. The product is no longer nearly as new, and its price falls into a lower price range. Even in 2022, this processor is more than…

Pros
  • a four-core, fully functional, high-performance processor that provides good value for the price range. It has a high potential for overclocking, theoretically (in practice, the maximum allowable limit has not been tested). After testing its maximum performance, it was discovered that using all 4 of its cores at 100% load was practically impossible. Due to the fact that it functions incredibly admirably for the majority of business jobs and games
Cons
  • He only "thinks" for an extended period of time during EXTREMELY complicated processes, such as the conversion of videos, the calculation of move options in complicated chess programs, and also, I suppose, in some other particularly complex engineering calculations. Yet doing such jobs is a quite different matter. They demand processors that have been specially configured for the time-consuming computing tasks that they necessitate.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am completely satisfied, item complies with description.

Got pros: AMD has switched to thinner tech. 45 nm process. This processor is the first result. Accordingly, less TDP, better acceleration. Some cons: Unfortunately, in the high-end segment, it is still inferior to top-end Intel stones.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

The temperature in the room is 33 degrees. Setchas. Percent costs 36. Zalman cooler 9700 ice, combined with native thermal paste. Zalman cooler 9700 ice. Within ten minutes, the temperature reached 54 degrees in linex. In my opinion, the temperature at which such a process should take place is not this one. The argument makes a lot of sense. blowing from the bottom up, or from the front to the back. despite some drawbacks. With such a high proportion, it is not without good cause that AMD's…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing I've ever used, a great item for everyone!

The following is the temperature of my processor at this same moment: 37–39 when the system is idle; 49–50 when the system is under load from AIDA 64; cooler speed (boxed) 1700–2300. Immediately after installing the operating system (if you installed it on a new one), I advise you to go into the BIOS and lower the voltage on the processor to 1.2-1.27v (you will have to select the minimum value individually). Typically, the BIOS overestimates the voltage; in my case, it was 1.42v. Additionally…

Pros
  • Price/performance. a potential for overclocking, cold temperatures, and noise when operating at standard frequencies
Cons
  • Changing the cooling system is necessary if you overclock a computer. Use of energy, most likely not any more

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item is of good quality, there is only one minor defect.

I spent a considerable amount of time hunting for a new CPU that would be able to take the place of my aging AMD Athlon II x2 215. I made the decision to exit at the 955 exit. The benefits that were outlined before, particularly the multiplier that might be unlocked, were very appealing to me. Upon the completion of the transaction, the occurrence of freezes (full) in software programs started almost immediately. Conducted several tests on it. Even if the processor is not overclocked, it…

Pros
  • amd phenom II x4 955. "phenom II." Affordable pricing. Cache 3 is equal to 6 megabytes. Am2, am2+, am3, am3+ compatible. 4 cores. 3700r. Unlocking the multiplier for use
Cons
  • High production of heat (125 = very much), critical temperature = 65 degrees Celsius. It is impossible for it to reach its full potential if it does not have access to a reliable cooler.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

An ideal product for any type of consumer.

Even though AMD has not manufactured this particular stone in quite some time, it is still available on the secondary market and is in high demand. This particular generation of AMD, which is based on the Deneb architecture, is justifiably regarded as a successful one! A brief look into the past: AMD's Phenom X4 Deneb was designed to compete with Intel's Core I5 and Core I7 processors, both of which are based on the Lynnfield/Bloomfield core and the Nehalem architecture. despite the fact that…

Pros
  • - Pricing, you can now buy it for one penny! - a fully functional four cores with 3.2 Gbps apiece (I have X4 955) - socket AM2-AM3
Cons
  • - Intelligence that is lost by one generation to the next - Stone that is sufficiently heated - Need effective cooling - Have a high demand for power

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

My workplace is a public access computer facility. I have some experience with the iron manufacturing industry's marketing strategy and am familiar with the idiosyncrasies of the market. Therefore, when I was choosing a new system unit for myself, it was out of the question to assemble it based on Intel, since their cost by 40 percent is a brand fee and multi-billion dollar advertising costs)))) ) Yet, there is not a discernible difference in performance between the two, and this is a FACT. The

Pros
  • 1. Four processor cores, each of which can be quietly overclocked to 3.8 gigahertz through the BIOS. 2. Unlocked multiplier and the capability to overclock the L3 cache by increasing the frequency of the north bridge from 2022 to 2700 megahertz (again through the BIOS) 3. A significant amount of power reserve for the future Even the most powerful games, like Subway 2033, are only loaded to a percentage of 30 percent. 4. Price. from Intel for such an amount, buy only an i3 or an i5, both of which this percentage will shred to pieces)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

With its pros. A very powerful number grinder. Sorts 10 million 64-bit numbers in half a second (Linux64, Mergesort, OpenMP, Open64CC with all optimizations). In idle, the temperature does not exceed 40 degrees. Cons below: It gets very hot, like all new processors. A boxed cooler is unable to cope with cooling at 400% load even with an open case (temperature > 82, the recommended maximum working according to the documentation is 62) Although the cooler is quiet with heat pipes, it is just a pl

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Well done, but I won't buy any more.

The stone did not overclock, but it works just fine in conjunction with the GTX 550 TI, all programs and applications work stably. Very demanding applications are not pulled out at lightning speed, but without lags and crashes. the newest games go like clockwork. BF 3, AC 3, Farcry 3, NFS MW2, Civilization V, 30-50 fps is stable. Crysis 3 is not so perfect), but playable in principle. Bottom line: not the latest product on the processor market, but powerful and stable enough for games and…

Pros
  • 1. Quality product. 2. The price for such performance, if not excellent, then very good. 3. There are no failures for two months of use. 4. Quiet operation. 5. Maximum temperature 43 Celsius.
Cons
  • did not notice. However, some may doubt the purchase because of the "age" of this model.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product, more pros than cons.

if there is an old unkilled mother under am2 - then this is a second life - in all seriousness. people, you will be surprised that by spending only 100 you will get a really NEW / COMPLETELY DIFFERENT LEVEL computer. who cares about the money - those to the new intels - they will change the socket for you one more time . Has pros: impressive price/performance ratio 100% sufficiency for all modern, not narrowly specific tasks Different cons: rarely indicated, but a real minus - in some…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is completely satisfied, performs its functions.

I traded it for an Athlon II x2 245, it's a slag, this one is visually even faster in Windows 7 x64, but slower than my Core 2 Duo E7500 with 6GB of RAM. I rate it 4 only because I actually got it for free. It makes no sense to take it, neither it, nor the top 980, nor other phenomena, because this is a waste of money, look either towards LGA1155, or wait for AMD FX. Although it is not yet known what they will be like.

Pros
  • Well, 4 cores, 6mb l3 cache, has a 95w TDP.
Cons
  • Kernels deneb without exception corn. Cache is slow, running at 2GHz

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, but I expected a little more.

The same CPU in a normal case (ATX), with a more expensive cooler from Zalman on the same tests, works stably within the critical temperature, but the cost is different. CPU 4600 rub. + cooler 1500 rub. But still, Intel, with the same characteristics and performance, will be more expensive. Pros: Who cares, for me the average percent. Although it shows very good performance in appropriate conditions, see comment. Has some cons The thermal package of this processor is 125W, while the declared…