Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 52
  • 5
    39
  • 4
    7
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    4
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

I bought it in a new assembly in the amazon for 40990 (05/14/22). I don’t know who writes about “hot” there, in stress on Aida above 49 it didn’t warm up for me (in room 25, CO be quiet dark rock pro 4, see photo)

Pros
  • Cold, productive.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

I bought this processor, I thought the power of my cooler was enough for 240w, plus I anointed the great mx4. As a result, I got about 50 degrees in stock. When starting the game, the temperature reached 86 degrees, although my "PCcooler carona 240w" cooler sucked me, my wife and cat for a long time, the neighbors thought that the SU-24 engine started in my apartment! It was possible to lower the temperature by lowering the voltage. Lowered the voltage by 200mW. The system works stably and this

Pros
  • Terrible performance
Cons
  • Very high temperatures

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing unusual, a normal product.

Yesterday I completely ated the system unit. I put the motherboard ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero. Prots this one, Ryzen 9 5900x. In short, we collected everything, tested everything perfectly, brought it home and started setting it up and then I looked at the browser and then the computer just turned off. I press the start button - it turns on, there is no image, 3 diodes of the VGA type hang on the mother display, code 90 and that's it, the start does not go. I launched it 50 times…

Pros
  • While working, the speed is just lightning fast.
Cons
  • Burned out, that's all

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is top notch, be sure to try it.

I got the CPU in OEM configuration. In a multi-threaded load, the cores go out at 4.5 GHz, in a single-threaded load at 4950 MHz. All this under a Noctua NH-U14S air cooler, but the system is noisy. You need to lower the voltage, or switch to LSS. The processors are quite hot. In games, the temperature, as a rule, reaches 72 degrees. If you add a stream to this, it reaches 80 degrees. FCLK has only submitted to 1900 MHz so far. Memory 1:1, that is 3800MHz@15-15-15-15-30 1T. (You can also use…

Pros
  • On duty, I dealt with AMD Ryzen processors of all generations, and despite their advantages: long-playing socket, number of cores, loyal pricing policy of the manufacturer, thermal interface, and many others. I always chose intel for myself. Cause? Stable and predictable work in all, without exception, applications, coupled with maximum performance in games. Yes, in certain professional applications they lagged behind due to the smaller number of cores, but not so much as to sacrifice speed in everyday, multimedia tasks. However, AMD did not stand still, and if the first two generations caused me nothing more than bewilderment (the products were frankly raw), then after working with the third Ryzen, I was satisfied with the processors. However, there was no desire to purchase one for myself. But with the release of Zen 3, the situation changed and I bought the 5900x. Impression: Quick. Faster than 9900K@5Ghz with 4400@17 memory, which is what I switched from to 5900x. Moreover, it is faster everywhere, starting with the banal installation of Windows, unpacking archives and installing programs, ending with games and a software package from Adobe, where Intel has always been ahead. There is no need to use monitoring and benchmarks to catch the difference. Visible to the eye! There is no need to talk about 12 cores and what they are capable of, and so it is clear. In games, which I did not expect at all, smoothness was added. And those who are afraid to buy AMD because of the high latency of the memory subsystem have nothing to worry about. I play Quake, Quake Champions and COD: MW 2022 on a 240hz monitor and I can say the responsiveness is great. Feels even faster than on the intel system. FPS sky-high. At medium and low settings, everything rests on the 2080 Super.
Cons
  • Heat dissipation and unpolished BIOS for motherboards. Many people experience problems with falling off USB ports (can be cured by disabling the Global C-States option in the BIOS) and errors when raising the FCLK above 1600 MHz. But all this will soon be corrected by the new AGESA.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

I took a computer to upgrade, because recently I have been processing video, and AMD is ahead in this for a long time. And finally, with this AMD series, similar Intel processors were bypassed in a single-threaded load, this is a pancake historical moment! I have been on AMD since the late 90s (not a principled supporter of AMD, purely for economic reasons, AMD has always been cheaper with +/- equal performance). A couple of times in 20+ years I looked in the direction of Intel, but repelled…

Pros
  • Excellent single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. I pre-rolled the firmware with support for Ryzen 5 on my Aorus Elite B450 (I don’t recommend, by the way, my mother is quite picky about memory and timings), and that’s all, no problems at all. Thanks to two processor units, the normal (doubled) speed of writing to memory has finally worked here.
Cons
  • Nothing, everything is fine. Unless it's all expensive with the current dollar exchange rate. I took it about 2 months ago for the same 48.5k, for which it is being sold now.

There is nothing to praise him for except for good advertising and synthetic tests. In fact, everything is sad. All my life I worked for Intel and then the devil pulled me to go. Adventures began from the very first minutes of work, after installing the OS, three blue screens in the first half hour of work. ated the BIOS, changed the memory, did not help. Began to freeze when opening the browser. I turned off the video card, sound card, all disks except the system one. The result is always the…

Pros
  • Good advertising based on synthetic tests.
Cons
  • Poor compatibility and general sophistication of the entire AMD architecture - processor, motherboard, etc. Prepare for hardware issues and blue screens. Unstable work. Hardware incompatibility.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

High-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

Before that, there was a 2950x threader. Compared to him, everything is +. Less consumption, more performance in multithreading and per core. With a cooler at a TDP of 200 watts, it keeps the temperature in the load at about 70 degrees. In games, everything rests on my RTX 2080 video card, but even so everything became smooth. Drawdowns have been significantly reduced.

Pros
  • Everything (compared to 2950x)
Cons
  • Didn't notice

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A high-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

Switched from i9-9900K. At first I strongly doubted it. last years 8-10 sat exclusively on stones from intel. But fortunately, he did not lose with the change of platform. I felt a performance increase immediately after installation, but after reading about a good overclocking potential, I naturally thought "why not add a couple of tens of percent more performance and lower the temperature along the way?" the benefit of curve helps to very finely select the voltage for certain frequencies…

Pros
  • Excellent performance
Cons
  • Not a drawback, but the harsh reality of all new processors (from amd and intel) - you need GOOD cooling.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I'm satisfied, it's a good purchase.

Really good stone, but very expensive. Now I would think many times before taking. Is Intel worth it? Don't know. AMD definitely loses in terms of heat dissipation, but wins greatly in terms of power consumption. In fact, there are no problems as such, except for the price. In part, in 5 years it will pay off simply on electricity bills, but the price is definitely too high.

Pros
  • Fast processor and it shows in every aspect of usage.
Cons
  • It is heated, the problem with heat dissipation is real. Not critical, but the reviews don't lie. Overprice price.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, it's nice to use.

In general, I am satisfied with the purchase, I changed the r5 3600 to 5900X, I initially took a fat mother in order to upgrade to 3950 in the future, but it turned out that the 5000 series would still be released, I decided to wait for it. I'm going to sit on this stone "to the last", maybe in the future the PC will no longer be interested or something cardinally powerful will come out. Yes, there is already DDR5, but the next couple of CPU generations will be run-in, it is better to endure…

Pros
  • - Good per-core performance, not the best anymore, but decent for the money - Price/core ratio - Pretty low heat dissipation, with the PBO setting, it is cooled without problems by something of the Gammaxx 400 level, of course it is better to set good cooling, but even so 4.5 keeps all cores at 100 load for half a day. The temperature is 76-80. In games 4.8-4.9. - Works on elderly X470 Taichi
Cons
  • - AMD legs - does not fully work on older chipsets

Revainrating 2 out of 5

A little disappointed, a bad purchase.

Constant spontaneous reboots not under load. Moreover, everything is fine in demanding games, but then you turn on the series or launch something light like League of Legends and suddenly get a reboot. Or you don't get it - how lucky. No blue screen, just reboot. For a long time I could not understand what the problem could be, but I came across a large number of posts on reddit with exactly the same symptoms.

Pros
  • Powerful enough if it works properly.
Cons
  • Doesn't work well.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Very pleased with this purchase, will recommend it to everyone!

So, the percent was bought as an upgrade for the slow-moving Ryzen 3600, which did not rightfully occupy a place in the Gigbyte X570 AORUS ULTRA, as part of a system for working with photographs, mainly in programs from Adobe - Lightroom + Photoshop. Such an upgrade gave an increase in the speed of importing RAW photos and building a 1: 1 preview by almost 2 times, an increase in the speed of exporting processed material with resizing and applying final sharpening by more than 2 times (measured

Pros
  • - performance in photography applications (Adobe Lightroom in particular) - high clock frequency (yes 4.9 GHz) with a single-threaded load - moderate power consumption during fixed overclocking - compatibility with old motherboards (great choice for upgrading an old system) - easy overclocking and tuning - excellent memory overclocking
Cons
  • - a shameful kit (sticker, Carl! ) for the box version of the pre-top processor - one of the CCXs is more likely to be worse than the second - the work of the bus turns the system unit into a buzzing firebox, nervously blazing from the launch of the browser - of course it is adjusted to an acceptable level, but why not optimize the work of the CO immediately when developing the motherboard firmware

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The price/quality ratio is great, I will buy again.

In the same Cinebench R23 and LinX, the processor heats up to only 72-75 degrees, due to the fact that the standard limit is 142W (that is, the processor does not exceed this value). I sat down surprisingly well on the Asus X470-F Strix motherboard, on the very first BIOS, the bus went to 1867 (memory 3733), I will try more on other versions of the BIOS, they say it is possible to fire up the IF bus up to 2022. I'm not sure that my memory will run at such frequencies, but I'll try to squeeze…

Pros
  • Excellent performance, able to encode 10 Mbit Slow preset online with virtually no frame loss. Gaming and work performance is excellent, especially after memory tuning. Compared to my past 2700X, the gain is huge in all areas of application.
Cons
  • Quite hot (although it doesn’t really bother the user, except for the fact that you need to set the fans to work correctly so that they don’t howl), due to the size of the chiplets, after all, the 7 nm manufacturing process, it is difficult to remove heat from this surface. In super-heavy tasks (encoding, rendering) it heats up to 83-85 degrees under air cooling BeQuiet Dark Rock 4 (rather expensive cooler), although they say some DEEPCOOL RED HAT will be no worse and cheaper.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

Excellent stone. Cooled by LSS Arctic 360 II. Temperatures in idle time are about 32 degrees, in normal operation up to 65-70 degrees. In the most severe stress tests (230 watts managed to be taken away) - 82 gr. To optimize performance and temperatures, it is worth adjusting the PBO2 and CO limits. Then get really full power. There are several ways to do this, including core tests with CoreCycler, but this takes at least 50-60 hours. Or you can use the Hydra software (latest versions starting…

Pros
  • The perfect balance of price/performance
Cons
  • not found

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the purchase suits, a very necessary product.

after 3600X with a 2080ti video card in 4k resolution in the Far Cry test, 5 fps was from 40 to 59. With the current processor, fps has increased from 68 to 92. 3600x with 2080ti loaded up to 80-95%. 5900x is loaded only by 20% despite the fact that overclocking is disabled. Yes, because when it was overclocked to 4950, the voltage went beyond 1.49 and possibly more, Noctua NH-D15 SE-AM4 kept it at 76 degrees or higher. so I had to turn off overclocking and the maximum hertz remained on each…

Pros
  • Fast, enough cores, more than enough for powerful games and a powerful graphics card. Bought for a future upgrade.
Cons
  • Very hot, in my OEM sample, the voltage reached 1.49, maybe more, because. it was not possible to set up monitoring.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything about the purchase suits me, a very necessary product.

on b450 in the region of 7000 you can start it calmly (B450 AORUS ELITE is the weakest mother in which you put it), but watching vrm under stress tests. I got 12022v and 4300 for all cores (for rendering a computer). Perc 65 maximum, vrm 75-80 but this is in stress tests. For games, of course, it’s better to take a better mother, as well as cooling, so that all turbo boosts work on a small number of cores) Towers are not cooled if for games, that is, you need to watch something from 5000 and…

Pros
  • cold and dragging
Cons
  • stove out of the box

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Think carefully before buying this product.

Less than a month of experience had to be handed over and changed. I am engaged in video and graphics, this processor copes worse with some programs, unlike core 9 and 10 generations, I hoped that AMD would fix it, but as always, theirs pseudo-cheapness may be next year and something will change but for myself I decided that Intel is still better than AMD, especially in my work.

Pros
  • Nothing not to like
Cons
  • The high price of motherboards for this processor and the percentage itself is also not cheap, and of course there are problems with the BIOS.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

A qualitative leap over Zen 2 and earlier generations. Multi-threading has become even better, single-threading is now comparable to Intel. Many new features that will help casual users to painlessly touch the world of overclocking and other computer enthusiasm. Expensive fast operative is now not so significant. Also: for overclocking, immediately take a super tower or collect water with a cool water block and a plump radiator.

Pros
  • -Ultimate victory over lagging in single thread. -Less sensitivity to memory relative to previous generations. -Sea cache. -Support PCI-e 4.0. -Useful new features for overclocking and everything related.
Cons
  • -Very hot when overclocking or boosting PBO2. - Pricing policy of the company.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Well done, but I won't buy any more.

The AMD Ryzen series is very different from Intel processors in psychology, it is more for overclocking wizards, if you want to plug it in, everything starts up and goes, and you don’t need to configure anything, then apparently AMD is not for you. For that, if you like to customize, optimize, etc. - here is a gap. Has some pros • Based on tests, it outperformed the 10th generation Intel i9. • The presence of 24 PCI-E buses of the 4th generation, against 16 lanes of the 3rd for the Intel i9 of…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Quality is top notch, happy with everything.

Bought the box version. The processor is great for rendering and working with video. Nimble stone, at the same time hot. I put CBO Corsair H150i RGB PRO XT on this stone. Under load, in games and rendering, the temperature can safely reach 75. In idle, 39-43. It is a little worth giving a small task, say, open Photoshop or a bunch of tabs in the browser, the temperature immediately rises to 50-55, and then drops sharply. In games, the increase is noticeable, FidelityFX Super Resolution is…

Pros
  • Cores, threads, performance.
Cons
  • If you are not careful when inserting into the board, you can bend the legs. The weakest point. With a new socket, this problem will be solved :)