Pros
- Quick.
Cons
- Very spicy (which is fairly usual for ryzen), but not a deal breaker.
Pros
- Price quality, appropriate for streaming, and never seen it load completely - Appropriate for low-cost motherboards
Cons
- - It warms up, but perhaps this is a software issue (like Aida64), as the BIOS reports a temperature of 50–55 at a temperature of 70 in Aida64.
Pros
- Price/performance. In due course, the processor of the people.
Cons
- No complaints.
Pros
- relative bargain when weighed against the cost of intel. help for a plethora of RAM producers. Ability to overclock with relative ease when necessary. help for outdated motherboards.
Cons
- marginally gluttonous, yet this may or may not be a drawback depending on the individual.
Pros
- Multi-core, sufficient processing power. inexpensive motherboards having a 5xxx series processor upgrade option.
Cons
- I don't suggest taking the packaged version if it's hot. The stress test's enclosed cooler immediately raises the temperature to 93 degrees.
Pros
- Top ten percent, I couldn't be happier that it can be installed even in the most problematic areas of the motherboard, such as my Giga A320m, and nothing will malfunction.
Cons
- They are not and will not be 9000 in the future.
Pros
- You can get your money processed normally, just somewhere else. It works great after I put it in yesterday. In addition, it fares admirably in taxing games that haven't been optimized for it.
Cons
- if the legs are bent, the packing is useless for shipment.
Pros
- - Power. Indeed, considering its pricing and if you want functionality that goes beyond gaming, the Ryzen range is typically the best option for you. - If the motherboard permits it, there is the possibility of overclocking, along with cooling. Later, though, we'll talk more about that: Due to the hype, the majority of motherboards appear to pair up with the CPU in a cordial manner right out of the box, but these situations are better managed; on some websites, it is removed as a separate line. - very clever Yes, this is really arbitrary, but before then I was already using the antiquated fx 8xxx (no, I didn't overclock it, it was simply right). But even in the most basic activities, the pace of this job is just on a completely other level, and in games, which I even tried with my hardware - which is not very cool, it more than suited me, given that I don't play super graphic games, maybe I only have 1660 x 1024 of RAM (not even Ti or Super). - It is still a step above Intel devices in the budget range for specialties like video and picture processing.
Cons
- – The temperature. This isn't really a negative, though. the result of my folly AVOID Taking the AMD cooler-equipped BOX version. The box version is 1.300 more expensive than the OEM at the time of my purchase. And it doesn't appear to be pricey, but. The DEEPCOOL 400 or PCCOOLER 5 or 6 series are preferable. Yeah, they are anywhere between $300 and $700 more expensive depending on the model (i.e., 1600 - 2022) and they will chill BETTER. There are many tests with screenshots on the Internet if you don't want to believe my value judgments. Good luck. If you also have a mATX case and want a 120 fan, PcCooler is obviously better to choose from the tower models because it is shorter (for series 5, I'm not sure about series 6); it has a height of only 148 mm. - This is likely a possibility for, among other things. Computer nerds, I don't know. Most of the time, Ryzen will likely force you to fiddle with the BIOS settings, including the CPU voltage and multiplier, which are unlocked here. Also, there won't likely be a need to suffer like that with Intel's piggy bank. Nevertheless, the multiplier is only accessible there in models that include a K indicator at the end, such as the i7 8700k. Do you need it? As if plus in AMD's direction You must exercise judgment.
Pros
- 1. There is no strong requirement for cooling. 2. Effectiveness and competence in operation
Cons
- 1. I don't believe the 65W heat dissipation claim; it's under 140W cooler with good thermal paste, yet the temperature in CPU Burner has reached 80 degrees after 21 minutes.
Cons
- There is not
Pros
- Performance.
Cons
- They come across different. The cooler from the boxed 3600 version is moving towards Intel in terms of development compared to the 1600 boxed version.
Pros
- 1) A wonderful "folk" processor for a reasonable price (although now a "more popular" 3500 has appeared at the price of the 2600th) 2) 6 cores / 12 threads - power! Probably will be used to the maximum with the release of a new generation of consoles, which will be on Ryzen 3rd generation 3) low TDP, even in gaming mode (fixed at 4.2GHz) never seen more than 40-50W consumption. Compared to my last "stove" FX-8350 - heaven and earth 4) do not need an expensive cooler. I bought a quiet turret Arctic Freezer 33, the temperature even in demanding games is not higher than 65 C 5) no lag in games, especially on a monitor with FreeSync support 6) compatibility not only with X570 motherboards (which are sold at overprice), but with B350/450 (I took MSI B450 Mortar Titanium for it) 7) in any tasks it’s just fire (archiving, video processing, games), on average, it is loaded by 20-40% 8) perfectly drags resource-intensive console emulators (in RPCS3 FPS at the level of 120-144 without problems, Yuzu also "drags"). The number of cores / threads affects.
Cons
- I did not notice any shortcomings.
Pros
- 1. No strong cooling requirement. 2. Efficiency and performance
Cons
- 1. I don't believe 65W heat dissipation, it's under 140W cooler with good thermal paste, and 80 degrees in CPU Burner after 21 minutes.
Pros
- Great for your money.
Cons
- There is not
Pros
- Excellent performance. 420225 for all cores out of the box. Cold stone. 6 cores / 12 threads which is currently the unspoken minimum. Games paired with 1070 fly at maximum speed. Significant performance increase relative to zen and zen+ In games, it is not inferior to 2700x in many tasks. 35mb cache. Works on old motherboards based on b350
Cons
- Already overclocked to the maximum from the factory, in terms of price / performance, buying a 3600X does not make any sense, especially with a price difference of about 5k. The retail price in our stores leaves much to be desired. After some time, prices will drop, so I advise you to wait for the hype to subside. Since the maximum tdp is already almost squeezed out of the processor, still not the indicated 65, so the complete cooler could be cram more interesting, but thanks for that. It will work, you can play, but without heavy tasks. While liquid bios.
Pros
- Price quality
Cons
- No
Pros
- Excellent performance for the price. This is Zen +, where AMD fixed the jambs of the first architecture. On 3600 there are no friezes in games, it chases and busses perfectly, subject to high-quality cooling.
Cons
- This is not Zen2
