In general, if you choose between 9600k and Ryzen 3600, take AMD, it outperforms a competitor in professional tasks and costs somewhere cheaper, and BIOS problems will be fixed soon. Different pros: The processor is good for the money, it pulls out the RTX 2070 SUPER, but there is a very big problem with Turbo Boost, more about that in the shortcomings. Has cons: I have an MSI B450 Gaming Plus board, most likely the problem is in its crooked BIOS, because when Boost is on, the voltage rises to…

I set the voltage to 12022 at a frequency of 4000, it’s enough for me, I can run more at 4200. Everything works in a load of more than 65, it doesn’t go up to 4000, there was 80+ in the drain I will add: it was very cold, the heating was not turned on, it wound up at 4250 at 1.35, the temperature in games was up to 75, but it became a little warmer but did not heat at all))) when the heating was turned on, I would return 4000 the difference in games and did not notice the work by eye)))

Satisfied, although, kmk, overpaid a little. 2600 would be enough for me with a large margin, the difference in performance is 15%, and in the price at the time of purchase - one and a half times. But it eats less, maybe on electricity the difference will pay off over time. Some pros: Performance. Enough for any scenario for a simple kent like me. Consumption 65 watts. Under a huge tower (Thermalright HR-02 macho) cold as a frog. In idle and under light loads, the fan does not even spin, and…

in work and grah it shows itself perfectly, overclocking is dead and in fact it is not there, in manual mode you can achieve big parrots in tests, but in real life it only gets worse from it, leave it in auto and norms

For games, overpay for 5600x (and for the price of 5600x in stores you can take a new 5800x for ebay), or Intel 10th, 11-. 12th line. With its pros. Temperatures, all on auto, at idle 38 degrees, in games 47-55, in a stress test 65-67, turret 4 tubes per kasar, gd900 paste. The VRM of the motherboard is also on the chill, 37-47 degrees. Cons below: Microfreezes / statters, the main sore of ryzens up to the 5000th series, unfortunately cannot be cured by anything, even by overclocking the RAM…

Plows without problems, stress tests pass well. With adequate auto overclocking, it makes no sense to manually delve into overclocking by multiplier and voltages. It will be possible to win a few percent, at higher temperatures with a small load or in idle time. Pros below: For its 13k, which were spent in the summer, the best offer on the market. It was possible to find for 11, but already with some risk. It runs well, the performance is on the level, but when overclocked even up to 4200 it…

Ohh . how much blood this processor drank from me . This is my first percent from AMD. The installation of the stone was in the GIGABYTE B450 AORUS M motherboard. In my case, the motherboard out of the box had the BIOS version F41, so the BIOS ate was not required and everything started out of the box. The system was cooled by the GAMEMAX GAMMA 500 RGB (200 tdp) tower and 3 THERMALTAKE Riliing12 RGB Sync Edition 120mm case fans. Solution to this problem: 1) Install the latest chipset from…

Different pros: For its price, a top, very cold, stock cooler with some sort of grizzly-smeared thermal paste, 35 degrees in idle, 50 in games under load, met all my expectations, didn’t try to drive, maybe it’s enough for the eyes, but judging by the reviews chases easily Cons below: There are none, except that the price jumped on it, but I managed to take it for 13400

Excellent processor. I've been waiting for something like this from AMD. In my opinion, this processor (without integrated graphics) has the best price / performance ratio. It doesn’t get very hot (I don’t overclock), though I installed the cooler with a large power reserve (so that the system unit is as quiet as possible). For those who have not bought it yet and are puzzling over the choice, I would advise you to wait for the new 5xxx series, there should be a real performance boost. I bought

This year it costs 107,000 tenge or 19,000 in stores in Kazakhstan. I bought OEM equipment from aliexpress last year, that is, without a box and a cooler. Got pros: The processor is great. Set and forget. In conjunction with 16 GB of RAM and a Radeon RX 5700 video card on the asus tuf gaming b450m-plus motherboard, it easily pulls all AAA game projects at 2k resolution. I have a monitor with a frequency of 75 frames. A computer with a Ryzen 3600 gives out completely at this frequency and above.

If you are not an avid overclocker, but just want a good percentage for games and work, take it, it’s really more interesting than the same 2700 and even more so the first generation. Looks like the process has paid off. In a word, a very positive experience! Got pros: Price-quality ratio. 6 cores and 12 threads! Good system responsiveness. No glitches etc. Good core/thread distribution. Prots is very universal, drags multithread! If you not only play, but also like to do editing, streaming…

In general, I liked the percentage, but still it’s worth overpaying a couple of thousand for 3600X and you will be happy. The second turbo boost has more potential, and the performance of the 3600 is slightly inferior to its more expensive counterpart. Different pros: Good performance, fairly powerful processor for the money, budget option for gamers Has cons: It produces a lower frequency than stated, and on turbo boost it is noticeably inferior to its brothers 3600X and 3600XT

The processor is good. Although I took it at an inflated price, I am satisfied with the purchase and do not think that I have lost much. For those who are interested in how many frames in different games - see the tests. Has pros: The first thing I want to note is that the processor is quite productive for its price. I don’t understand people who complain about heat dissipation, I have a small (really small) tower for 1500 and under a load of 100 percent I couldn’t heat it above 70 degrees…

I advise you to buy for those who assemble a computer in 2022. There is still no point in switching from the old 6-8 nuclear Ryzens of 1-2 generations. On ebay, they began to massively sell used 1600/2600, 1700/2700 at a big discount. If you want to save money, then it’s okay to take past generations. 2600 for 7-8 thousand will not be much worse, but 40% cheaper. I don't see any point in taking the 3600X (x). Air charge. It's better to add and buy 8 cores.

There were a couple of nuances, I had to flash the mother, since this is done conveniently and takes literally 5 minutes, since there are no instructions for the 3000th line of support on the x370 chip Has pros: I took 4200 without any problems, at least on the mother of asus crosshair hero vi x370 Stable work with any memory, and not like with the previous generation through time Has cons: Probably, the only weak point is the cooler, it is enough, they are quiet, but I still changed it to…

Well, what can I say, I put it on the ASUS ROG Strix B450-F Gaming motherboard, initially I wanted to save 2,000, put it on the Tomogawk Max, but the latter was defective, I had to take the asus. The flight is normal, it cools this monster PCCooler GI-D56A HALO RGB with MX-4 toothpaste, in idle 30-35, in games 60-65 degrees. I moved to this whole thing from the i5 4690, as I looked at the tests. Ryzen has 156% better performance, I was partially convinced of this, where before the game rested…

I sold a Ryzen 5 2600 and bought a 3600. The 2600 also has jumps, but less and the heating is also less without overclocking . 75 degrees at max with a three-pipe cooler and a 92cm fan. And the 3600 is already climbing into 80 on a larger cooler . Now I regret that I started messing around with the replacement, I should have left 2600 and don't take a steam bath . Got pros: Same and higher performance in some places at a lower price than the competition Its cons: Temperature spike from voltage…

There are a lot of reviews for this percentage, so I'll be brief. I RECOMMEND. Its pros: + price performance ratio + moderate heat dissipation (although with a boxed cooler in stress tests it heated up to 80+ degrees, but it's more like a boxed cooler is rubbish. I took pccooler 6 and everything was ok) + percent from the category inserted and forgot + cheap cooling and motherboard Has some cons - Now, when the price of hardware has fallen, it's worth thinking about the i5 9600k - it's more…

Has some pros 6/12 - after the "eternal" FX 8350 it felt like changing the fret to Solaris. Optimal performance for sane money. (At the time of purchase, the 5600 cost almost the same as two of these) Some cons: It makes no sense to take the box version if your requirements go beyond the "office" because the ryzen, oddly enough, feels hotter than the old FX. I bought a be quiet cooler for it! DARK ROCK TF - enough for me.

From each iron they sing how good it is on AMD, this is the first time I am assembling a system on it, although I have had a laptop on the Ryzen 4600H for a year now. The motherboard was chosen with a margin for the transition to the 5000 series. What can I say, the rumors are embellished, as I think, as always, a lot of nuances. If I'm not lucky, if everything is not so rosy. There are some problems with overclocking on this CPU, don’t believe the diferambs, you won’t achieve anything beyond…