💻 AMD Athlon II X2 240e 2.8GHz Socket AM3 Dual-Core CPU, 2x1MB Cache Review

Some pros: Extremely capable of being overclocked; achieved a speed of 4 GHz at 1.432V. Cheap. To a certain extent, chilly. One of the drawbacks is that there is no level 3 cache. Unfortunate circumstances with the core: regor was captured, and unlocking was unsuccessful.

The benefits of it include: Cheap motherboards may achieve high frequencies and steady overclocking of up to 3.8 GHz. extremely poor heat dissipation and temperature at such acceleration (up to 41 degrees Celsius under load in the winter). Cons include insufficient cache memory, which, although not a deal breaker, does contribute to a very low level of heat dissipation.

Athlone x2 215 - in the specifications they write that it is 2.7 GHz, but if you go to the "control panel-system" - it says that the processor is 738 MHz. I downloaded CPU-Z - the same garbage. Until I figured it out. Perhaps the energy saving utility is wise. Although, I turned it off, threw it out of startup and rebooted the computer.

Got pros: power in games with video radeon hd4350 and 2 sticks of 2 giga ddr2-1066 encodes video with a bang with a non-native cooler, it heats up to 21 when surfing and 46 when playing games With its cons: with the AM2 motherboard did not work, but with am3 ready without updating the bios to the am3 support level it worked !

Outstanding overclocking capabilities and potential. Almost never gets hot enough to heat up. Even when the clock speed was increased to 3.3, the temperature did not shift. Cooler for 300. In conjunction with the GTS 450, CS:GO may be played at 60+ frames per second. I couldn't ask for anything more!

That was a temporary plug for a socket that I purchased (MSI 760G-P43 FX). Although it showed out to be a plug, I'm still debating replacing it because 2 cores is such a small toolbox. Certain benefits Quite a reasonable cost in relation to intelligence. My ii270 is rated 6.9 by Win8, whereas my friend's i3 is rated 7.1. The processor cannot heat up because it is placed behind a pretty large heatsink with two fans and copper pipes, but it does not. Ideal for those folks who require a reasonably

In recent times, a contented owner of an AMD Athlon II x2 265 processor installed in an AM3 socket. Over the course of the upgrade, it was switched out for one that had six cores. With dual-channel memory and a graphics card, the GTS 450% was capable of providing comfortable gameplay in current titles until the middle of the 2022s, not to mention other chores that were less demanding; it ran a variety of CAD applications without any issues. Naturally, it has become more difficult to cope in…

The processor isn't that awful considering it's from 2k20. If there is no money, then using the space is a fantastic choice, and it is highly doubtful that you will discover something better. The issue is acceptable even in the most routine surfing on the Internet; it does not present itself in an unfavorable light in toys, but the knshn is not present in the newest, most popular ones. In conclusion, if you are constructing a personal computer for purposes other than playing games or performing

who wrote that it does not work in tandem with ddr2 1066, but everything works stably on my asrock board. If you are building a budget computer and don’t want to spend a lot of money on a percentage, then you can safely take this stone now. even in a crisis, you can rest easy if you have a good video card :) Got pros: Low heat dissipation, decent overclocking potential, performance-price ratio. There would also be the possibility of unlocking other cores, but unfortunately only two physical…

The perfect processor for the price. On the basis of this processor, you can assemble a completely powerful and at the same time cheap computer, for example, for giving. I must say right away that you need to buy everything according to the level, that is, it would be stupid to take a GTX Titan to it, but you don’t need to take plugs either, some HD6670 is enough. In almost all games, the processor shows incredible performance, at least 60 fps. But, when it comes to games that require more than

Bought as a replacement for a 5 year old Sempron 3000+ (1.6 GHz, AM2, Manila). After ating the BIOS, it started up without problems, and given that I rarely play games, the processor's performance is quite enough, Autocad and video encoding to mp4 under Nokia 5800 work with a bang. True, when converting, the percent was not loaded at 100%, perhaps the hard drive became the bottleneck. AMD's next stop is the Buldozer generation, with DDR4 =)