Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 108
  • 5
    50
  • 4
    38
  • 3
    8
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    10

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A practical product, nothing to complain about.

Bought it for work. I take 500 pictures every day. In about a year I have already taken more than a hundred thousand pictures, everything is fine. The only thing that does not suit me is that in low light, the pictures are blurry and you have to retake, which takes time. Basically I take a picture of the rack with the goods. Maybe the photos turn out better with people, I don’t know .

Pros
  • Attractive price. Takes pictures normally, at least better than most mobile phones.
Cons
  • Auto date is inserted in only one shooting mode. In low light, the pictures are blurry, alas. It takes a long time to copy pictures to the computer. Copy twice as fast with the included software.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

What you need, a cool purchase, I advise you.

Worth your money anyway. If you are faced with a choice - read the tests, look at the photos. But the main thing to remember is that in such moments the opinion can never be objective. Someone likes one thing, someone else, and that's fine. Personally, the a480 is more than satisfied with me. Got pros: Certainly the price. It was she who was one of the main parameters of choice. In addition to it, I really wanted the device to conduct high-quality shooting with a small amount of lighting. I…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

In every way, I can afford it :) With its pros. Well, first of all, the price is good. I was even surprised at what a camera for 2 thousand is capable of). Macro shooting is the most important worthy (in my opinion). Takes great pictures in daylight Photos are clearer with flash than without flash. Batteries (even cheap ones) last a long time. Has cons: Of course, if you hold your breath when shooting without a flash, you get a good photo) I'm afraid to hurt the palastmass case, it looks…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

You just need to decide BEFORE buying what the camera is for. This model does not have manual settings, so it is not suitable for those who need them. Well, for mom to take pictures of flowers and mushrooms - perfect, everyone is happy with us :) Compact, light and stylish little thing that can do a lot, weighs nothing and costs nothing :) The quality is higher than the price. As for the noise: the compact is able to give out decent picture quality! But for this you need to set the minimum iso…

Pros
  • 1. PRICE! 2. photo quality at low iso 3. Super-macro is really super :) 4. It can do a lot, but it costs little :) And there are long shutter speeds, and exposure compensation, etc. 5. Everything is convenient and understandable. For grandmother there is an "auto" mode and two buttons - "turn on" and "remove" :) For a bro - everything else, but I have a DSLR :))) This is for a fotik family :)
Cons
  • 1. NO MANUAL SETTINGS! Unfortunately, they are not shoved into such budget models, which is a pity. 2. Long exposures (from 1+ to 15 seconds) are implemented ONLY in the "fireworks" mode. Thank God, the mode sets the minimum iso, but the white balance cannot be adjusted there. 3. No viewfinder4. AA batteries (well, this is not for everyone) 5. The battery level is not visible until it is discharged :)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

At one point, they decided to buy it as a replacement for the Pentax M10 that had been unsuccessful. That every comparison should be made in relation to the camera that was just mentioned. I am extremely content with the quality of the images, despite the fact that I am not a professional. The majority of the video clips have an excellent level of production value. When I was looking for a camera, I read that this particular model does not play any sound when watching videos, but this is not…

Pros
  • image quality that is above average; ease of use; exceptional video quality; overall value for the price.
Cons
  • It takes a very long time for the flash to charge, and you are unable to utilize the zoom function while the video is being recorded.

For those who are just starting out in photography, I highly recommend it. Do not overlook the fact that you will also require a memory card and a case for it. Include at least a thousand. to the price of a fotik for the purpose of these activities. And put that to good use:)))! Has some pros It took me a significant amount of time to decide on a camera. I did a lot of research online and read a lot of reviews. I have decided to stick with this till I am content. The camera was selected for use

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Terrible quality, wasted money.

Its pros: I haven't been able to figure it out yet due to constant breakdowns. Cons: I bought it in December 2022. During this period of time I managed to take several dozen shots. It broke down twice already. It hangs with an open lens.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Bad! I am not satisfied with the quality of the product.

My fotik is dead, I temporarily take pictures with my phone, but naturally the quality leaves much to be desired. There was a need to photograph sports competitions in the fresh air. I took this Canon A480 camera to work. The shooting conditions were ideal - a bright sunny day. I took about a hundred pictures, and at home when I began to look at the computer I was terribly disappointed. All the pictures are just terrible noise! Also, the sharpness leaves much to be desired. For the sake of…

Pros
  • 1. The price, when I found out how much it costs, I was even surprised, on the other hand, the price explains the quality. 2. Ease of use. 3. AA batteries 4. Flash cards of the popular SD format.
Cons
  • 1. Terrible noises even in excellent lighting conditions. This device may be defective. 2. 3x optical zoom, we can say that it does not exist, digital is one name.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the purchase suits, a very necessary product.

Some pros: cool fotik, video plays with sound, fotkaet clearly, does not lubricate, in general I am satisfied with the purchase. I advise everyone to buy. Different cons: The downside is that it runs on batteries instead of a rechargeable battery.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Very pleased with this purchase, will recommend it to everyone!

Foik is great! The pictures are of high quality, bright, natural colors. Connected to the TV, looked at the photos on it - super! I'm happy with my purchase. ;) Its pros: It took me a long time to decide and I read a lot of reviews. Finally bought today. I want to say that he fotik did not disappoint me. Of course, I'm not an expert in photography, but I'm picky about quality. I'm satisfied so far. Chose blue - cool look! Has cons: I couldn't read the instructions on the disk. Opens with…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

Different pros: Good, clear shots with flash or in good light. Quick turn on. Adequate autofocus. Clear video footage. Has some cons A small carcass - it sits very uncomfortable in a man's hand. Slowly shifts focus when recording action movies.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

I bought a camera for my mother: her first granddaughter was born at her 60 years old, and the old 5-year-old Kodak broke down, there is nothing to take pictures with, and the child is growing rapidly. The device has not yet been handed over, i. E. he has not yet been on the battlefield in the hands of the inept, but on the basis that a 60-year-old woman, apart from the ON button and the nearby release button, does not need anything at all - this device is the most THAT: price-quality ratio…

Pros
  • compact, but not ultra-thin - lies confidently in the hand; image quality is excellent; fast start; auto mode is excellent; AA batteries; SD card; autofocus
Cons
  • not found yet well, maybe you can mention the complete lack of internal memory (without a memory card, there’s nowhere to record photos at all)

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing unusual, a normal product.

no one can shoot on this camera except me. - the pictures are muddy (even on the street) as if everyone's hands are shaking . I don't know. in general, expecting a gorgeous photo quality from a soap box for such a penny is just stupid, but taking pictures in the country as children play in the sandbox is possible with this camera, it won’t be a pity if they bury it in this sandbox =)))

Pros
  • a bunch of manual settings (to which, for several years of use, hands never reached) easy to handle cheap price
Cons
  • amateurs cannot take a normal picture on this camera - everything is blurry and muddy. the battery indicator is not displayed. starts to suddenly mog when the fotik begins to "die". The battery cover is flimsy. I thought it would fall off right away, but no) it has been living for several years already.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

It was bought to replace the A560, which was simply broken. I also tried the Nikon P100 - the price is a bit high, and the quality of the kenans in terms of color rendering is better. Also, Kenon is not engaged in software elimination of matrix defects, and this is a plus. Pros below: The presence of macro photography, removes almost 1 cm from the lens. Operates on finger batteries. Just put not cheap China. GP 2022 work fine. intuitive menu, the ability to put an alternative firmware…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good product for me, no problems at all.

Has some pros I have been using the camera since August 2022. The price-quality ratio is perfect. The quality of the photo is excellent. Has cons: Not quite a modern design, but these are all trifles (the most important thing is the quality of the pictures, but it is at a good level)

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not worth the money, I will not advise this product.

Because my fotik is broken, I have to make do with taking pictures with my phone for the time being, despite the fact that the quality leaves a lot to be desired. There was a pressing requirement to capture sporting events outside in the open air. I brought my Canon A480 camera with me to work today. The shooting took place on a beautiful sunny day, which made for great conditions. I took around a hundred pictures, and when I got home and started looking at them on the computer, I was really…

Pros
  • 1. The cost; I was taken aback when I discovered how much it costs; on the other hand, the cost provides context for understanding the product's level of quality. 2. The simplicity of its operation. 3. AA batteries 4. Flash cards that utilize the common SD file format.
Cons
  • 1. Terrible noises even in excellent lighting conditions. There is a possibility that this device is broken. 2. We are able to say that a 3x optical zoom does not exist; the term digital zoom is used interchangeably.

In fact, despite the "nasty things" written in the shortcomings, this machine "draws" well on its 10 megapixels, making it possible for the "cheap" to have a full-fledged - not in functions, but as pictures - digital camera, which also has impeccable automation. And which will shoot, shoot and shoot again, unlike the same phone, which will instantly run out of the remaining half of the charge. We have been using it for more than 5 years, looking askance at the DSLRs. Like, yes, they shoot more

Pros
  • The price was low at the time, while it can be said that it did not affect the quality of the photos in any way. Even the lack of availability of wholesale. You only notice the stabilizer by blinking the red icon in medium and low light conditions. Video is also normal, however, its high bitrate and quality (as well as minutes of recording, measured immediately in gigabytes :)) is perhaps a common feature of Canon devices. The design here is sometimes scolded in vain, despite a certain childishness, it is still harmoniously laconic, in general, neat. Yes, and a variety of body colors at one time is a plus, you can give a white lady a gift, a black man, and blue and red for the rest. The same PowerShot A590 - that's where the horror-horror in comparison with, everything is round, as if from the 60s, but it shines beautifully. A decent implementation of the super macro mode. With proper skill, you can easily scan film. Or micro-patterns on banknotes. Compact and lightweight, that goes without saying. AA batteries, convenient when traveling, the charge ran out, you get the same ones from a flashlight or buy in a passing selmag and take a picture further. Unlike earlier Canon digital cameras, there is no problem of instant exhaustion and lack of voltage or battery power, everything is fine and for quite a long time, three hundred photos on a very average battery is a common thing. For those who want to tweak the manual settings without buying an advanced photo, it is possible to download the CHDK program. Bay on a flash drive, everything works.
Cons
  • All the shortcomings naturally stem from the low price niche: simple design, lack of all of these stabilizers, wheels, touch screens and other flash shoes. This is for devices of a completely different class and price. There is also a simple screen and a slow transfer to a computer via a USB cord, exactly 1MB / s, no more. While the pictures weigh ~ 3 MB. When looking at a full size pixel by pixel, each small detail is smeared within a square of 2 * 2 or 3 * 3 pixels, i. E. the real resolution differs from the nominal 10 megapixels from 2 to 9 times. But let's not forget that it belongs to the class of soap dishes that speaks for itself, this is not a SLR, where pixel by pixel is on a fixed lens. ISO noise is the same reasonable consequence of a matrix of a typical digital camera format 1/2.3, but I must say, not the smallest (for the same A590 it turns out to be even less - 1/2.5). As a result, even an inexpensive 5-megapixel smartphone on Android shoots exactly the same way in typical mediocre residential lighting in terms of noise and resolution . which even surprised me. Tablet is the same. So the current mobile phones are filmed at the level of digital cameras, this is a fact. We want better pictures than on a phone - you need to look to the side where advanced compacts, DSLRs and mirrorless cameras rule the roost . or don't bother.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I have not regretted the purchase, everything is fine.

This is a tool that I utilize in my job. photographs of various things, documents, and the like. Documents are captured regularly, while other subjects, such as classmates, are not overly blurry when the camera is concentrating, and it captures images normally without the need for a flash even when the lighting is dim. In contrast to the Samsung, it does not consume a battery very quickly. The primary drawback is that the battery cover is made of weak material; if you replace the batteries…

Pros
  • Standard Batteries Having a high-quality image. Focusing that is both normal and quick Quite an impressive menu
Cons
  • Holding it in one's hands might be a source of discomfort for a man. The battery cover is rather flimsy. Buttons that are not situated optimally

A masterpiece for its time. The price / quality ratio is on top. After 6 years of service and 7,000 thousand, the photo was handed over to his parents, where he continues to work to this day. He went on all trips and trips. My brother took it to Baikal, I took it to the deposits, frost and shaking, dust, moisture - everything was for nothing. Thanks to Canon for a great series of power shots. Before that there was an A400. The next, out of interest, is the more expensive and modern Nikon.

Pros
  • Reliability. Durability. Price.
Cons
  • Medium plastic. But that's just my opinion.