Pros
- I liked the macro mode here
Cons
- 1) I used it very rarely throughout the year. I only took it for birthdays. but all the same, for some reason it broke - the lens began to move out and in when it wanted to. horribly creaks and all that. 2) there are many modes, such as "party", "portrait" and all that, but, to tell the truth, I did not see the difference. 3) a very strange menu for me personally 4) shooting even in normal light . brr. the noise is just crazy.
Pros
- Very handy soap dish, which, if desired, you can take amazing photos. I especially like the color rendition (use the "Sunset" mode). It's just something! Such colors are bright, juicy, beyond words. The price is another big plus. Well, convenient settings, rummaging through which you can create masterpieces. It fits comfortably in the hand, taking pictures is a pleasure.
Cons
- I don’t like the long charging of the flash, but here it’s more likely the batteries. Well, in cloudy weather, the quality of the shooting deteriorates noticeably. A camera for clear sunny days.
Pros
- 1 Price 2 Closest to the optimal ratio Noise per sensor size. 3 Pictures at ISO up to 400 can be described as the norm. 4 Power type AA
Cons
- 1 Interface is outdated 2 No screen position sensor - vertical-horizontal 3 The screen is grainy (the norm for the price)
Pros
- Price, video and photo quality, incl. indoors in low light, batteries.
Cons
- The design is cheap and matches the price.
Pros
- Price. An excellent ratio of the size of the matrix and the number of pixels, which ensures the absence of noise in good and medium lighting - it's a pity that now they don't sell cheap ones with this ratio. aspherical lenses.
Cons
- It's hard to get a good shot in the dark, apart from the long exposure mode that requires a tripod. Not the most convenient button control - on more expensive Canon, the modes can be conveniently switched with a rotary switch. I would like better quality at high (400 and above) sensitivity values. But for a price less than 3000. it's already nitpicking.
Pros
- The price-quality ratio is at a very high level. At a cost of 3500. gives very bright, beautiful photos. Very easy to use - a great choice for a gift for the elderly. Lightweight, small size.
Cons
- There is no low battery indicator. A bit thick compared to the Canon brothers (due to the battery compartment). Actually, the batteries themselves, I think, can be attributed to the minuses. Still, carrying a battery charger with you on vacation is extra baggage (I have it fancy, not easy), and buying batteries every time is quite expensive.
Pros
- It is true that the low price at the time did not in any way influence the quality of the photographs, despite the fact that it was low at the time. Especially the lack of wholesale products being available. When there is medium or low light, the blinking of the red indicator will alert you to the presence of the stabilizer. Video is likewise typical; however, the high bitrate and quality of the video (in addition to the minutes of recording time, which is immediately measured in gigabytes:)) is possibly a characteristic that is shared by many Canon products. The design is occasionally criticized unjustifiably, but in spite of a certain amount of childishness, it is nevertheless beautifully laconic and, in general, neat. Yes, and the presence of multiple skin tones at the same time is an added bonus. For example, you could give a present to a white lady, a black man, and blue and red to the other people. The very same PowerShot A590 - that's where the horror-horror in comparison with, everything is round, as if from the 60s, yet it shines nicely. A workable execution of the super macro mode. It is not difficult to scan film if you have the necessary skills. Or the intricate patterns on bills. It should go without saying that it is portable and lightweight. AA batteries, which are helpful for when you are traveling; if the charge ran out, you can acquire the same ones from a flashlight or buy them in a passing selmag and take a photo further on. There is no issue of instant exhaustion and lack of voltage or battery power, everything is fine, and for quite a long time, three hundred photos on a very average battery is a common thing. This is in contrast to earlier Canon digital cameras, which suffered from these issues. Downloading the CHDK program is an option for individuals who are interested in adjusting the manual settings of their camera but do not wish to invest in an advanced model. Everything is operational when stored on a flash drive.
Cons
- All of the drawbacks are a logical consequence of the cheap price niche, including the straightforward design and the absence of a variety of stabilizers, wheels, touch displays, and other flash shoes. This applies to a whole other category and price point for electronic products. In addition, there is a straightforward screen and a sluggish transfer to a computer via a USB cable, which takes exactly one megabyte per second and no more. While the images take up less than 3 megabytes each. If you look at an image at its full size, pixel by pixel, you'll notice that each microscopic detail is smeared into a square of either 2 * 2 or 3 * 3 pixels; this means that the real resolution is significantly lower than the nominal 10 megapixels. But let us not forget that it is a member of the category of soap dishes that speak for themselves. This is not a single-lens reflex camera, in which each pixel is captured by a lens that is fixed. ISO noise is the same understandable consequence of a matrix of a normal digital camera's format 1/2.3, but I have to note that it is not the smallest (for the same A590, it turns out to be even less - 1/2.5). As a consequence of this, even a low-cost smartphone with only 5 megapixels that runs on Android would produce images with the same level of noise and resolution while shooting in normal average home lighting. I was even taken aback by this fact. It's the same thing as a tablet. It is a proven truth that the cameras found in modern mobile phones are on par with those found in digital cameras. If you want to take images that are more impressive than those taken with a smartphone, you will need to go to the side, where advanced compacts, DSLRs, and mirrorless cameras reign supreme. just don't even bother trying.
Pros
- optics, automation, pricing, and AA batteries (2x2500 batteries are enough for around 2.5 hours of video and more than 2022 photographs) are the four most important aspects of this camera.
Cons
- In the same manner as all other manufacturers, the actual resolution of the matrix is concealed (megapixels, at which the device really gives Detail, and not slur, even in the most ideal conditions)
Pros
- Cheap. Sometimes it works.
Cons
- 1. For a year, it was under repair 2 times for 45 days, it broke again, they no longer repaired it. Lens gear problem. Used this year for a maximum of 3 weeks. 2. The battery cover is a nightmare for all Canon models. Breaks down instantly. 3. Batteries eat terribly! Likewise with batteries. I bought it for a teenager, mostly, of course, pictures on "Auto", the flash often works when it's not needed, respectively - an additional expense. 4. It's strange to see such poor quality (with such a processor!) of photos. I honestly tried to achieve something similar to acceptable quality - well, except for single copies. 5. The settings are inconvenient, there is no direct access, the grip is bad.
