Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
old model: canon eos 5d mark ii full frame dslr camera (body only) - review, specifications, and pricing logo

Old Model: Canon EOS 5D Mark II Full Frame DSLR Camera (Body Only) - Review, Specifications, and Pricing Review

30

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.5
📷 Digital Cameras

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(1)
img 1 attached to Old Model: Canon EOS 5D Mark II Full Frame DSLR Camera (Body Only) - Review, Specifications, and Pricing

Details

Model Name5D MARK II
BrandCanon
Form FactorSLR
Skill Levelアマチュア
Special FeatureLive_view
ColorBlack
See 5 more

Description of Old Model: Canon EOS 5D Mark II Full Frame DSLR Camera (Body Only) - Review, Specifications, and Pricing

21.1-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor, 14-bit A/D conversion, wide range ISO setting 100-6400. Body only, lenses sold separately,1-Year Canon U.S.A. Limited Warranty. DIGIC 4 Image Processor; high-performance 3.9 fps continuous shooting; Live View Function for stills. Full HD video capture at 1920x1080 resolution for up to 4GB per clip ; HDMI output. Updated EOS Integrated Cleaning System specifically designed to work with a full-frame sensor.

Reviews

Global ratings 30
  • 5
    22
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A high-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

I do not shoot video with this camera, many who work with video have complaints about this block, read the reviews if this moment is important for you to work Pros: Improved version of the previous model, live view mode, operating speed, touch screen, change in bb metering module With its cons: the battery eats up the battery very quickly, I personally have it faster than it was with the previous model.

brand, after which there were 3, and there are currently 4 Has pros: 1) A dual-pxl autofocus that is extremely quick 2) 30mg pixel matrix 3) A touch screen that responds quickly, just as quickly as an iPhone 4) An interface and ergonomics that are similar to those of other devices 5) Maintaining autofocus while traveling at a high altitude Has some cons: Battery life is shorter because to the truncation of 4K video, but this did not influence my decision in any way.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm impressed! Exactly the product deserves your attention.

With Canon for over 20 years operating with Canon 5D Mk2, a lover of new gadgets and upgrades, for me it's like this - the camera should shoot, - coped with the duty perfectly, but the transition to the Mk4 was a step in the wrong direction. Has pros: - Dramatic enhancements to the image quality; - Full functionality of the high ISO setting; - Exceptional performance from the automatic white balance system - The speed and accuracy of autofocus has been greatly enhanced; - The coverage area of…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

I personally purchased a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Body, and the price is fairly reasonable. Everything works perfectly, and the shipment arrived to me in a tidy and orderly manner; all in all, a very suitable store. Pros: I appreciated the quality of the service and handling, the design of all of the products, and the layout of the entire site as a whole. However, the following are some of the site's drawbacks: In my experience, I did not have any issues when purchasing items, and I have no grounds

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

The focus is even quicker, thousand (noises, of course, are apparent, but there are nearly none at 3200), and the camera is brand fresh in comparison to the mark 3 if you want to study other applications, you can select a point in live view mode and then snap a picture with only one click. this works even if the shooting point is not at eye level. Below are some downsides: When I first got the camera, the battery had already gone through a significant amount of discharge. When I examined the…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Exactly what I needed, it's a great buy, I recommend it.

On a clear day, set your aperture priority exposure compensation to -1 stop. Keep in mind that if you shoot in reduced M-RAW, there will unavoidably be quality reductions because this is software compression of full-fledged RAW in the corpse. Take cards from 95Mb s for the four 24-70II lenses, the 35 1.4II, the 85 1.4L IS, the 70-200, and the 135mm (not terrible, although focus shift occurs). Tamrons 45mm (not bad, but color and speed may be better.) Additionally from the older ones, they…

Pros
  • New generation's LifeView: It works on the face (getting into the eyes) on open holes,
Cons
  • A whole stop of light is located in the dual pixel, in another channel, a manufacturer's warning light, and the sky is nearly completely obscured by automation if you shoot in aperture priority mode with exposure settings of 0 (by default) during the daytime on the street. About 15-20% of corpses in 2022 will have a little flaw that causes them to freeze until the battery is removed and then stop working. For those who have this issue, the solution is floating, as all high-end optics created prior to 2022 will not permit the camera matrix ON OPEN HOLES (F1.2-1.4).

the shutter noise is much lower, at 16000, but not worth it moreover, except maybe because of the speed of shooting. if you, like me, are actively involved in photography and have a third mark or choose between 3 and 4, I recommend waiting for the release of the fifth. the additional megapixels are not particularly important (there are only 8 more of them).

Pros
  • It turns out that a triple camera set-up takes 17 raw frames rather than 13.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

On the other hand, while shooting on SD (when all CFs were full), it started to hang until it was written to the card, which was incredibly frustrating and should be in every calculator. This is due to the removal of a rotatable screen and the somewhat greater size of RAW files (only 1300 photographs can now fit on 64GB). given the foregoing, I can safely say that I am pleased with the camera. I pray it lasts forever! Perhaps someone will find some use in my personal opinions while they shop…

Pros
  • I was hesitant to buy it at first, the megapixel count was increased slightly but otherwise kept the same (the third mark is already an old man, let alone the second), and the flickering issue was nearly resolved (though it still doesn't always work with a projector, and there are other frequencies for the campaign). What is it? At least passably so The results are correct and quite "tasty" hues after that, First, and the shadows and lights are now stretching cool. No one is immune to severe overexposure, but if the picture comes out so "fat" even when exposed correctly, something is wrong.
Cons
  • However, there is a drawback to this: even though a beautiful image gives the impression of a beautiful photograph, he still won't take pictures for you.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product did not cause delight, but you can use it.

I've been using your products for a very long time. I've used the 350d, 1D MARK III, 5D mark II, 5D mark III, MARK III, and only have one remaining 5D mark III. I was also present when the new Sony A9 and 100-400 were unveiled. the focus distance is 70. Let's try a 5 now with the identical parameters. Therefore, Sapozhok lost to A9 in continuous shooting speed because he missed the focus, was unable to output 24 because Canon has that level of operating ISO, lacks matrix stabilization, and…

Pros
  • but no more than 7r
Cons
  • There is no matrix stabilization, no four high noise levels, and no reasonable working ISO level compared to competitors.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Overall pretty good, an equal number of pros and cons.

If you're in the market for a new camera in 2022, you may want to consider the EOS R5, as new lines of kenon optics have been announced for this system and the old EF optics can be installed through a native adapter, while the 5D4 is technologically obsolete and the secondary market can offer much more interesting options for the same price, such as the mark 3 +.

Pros
  • It appeared that autofocus on a number of spots had improved, leading to generally sharper photos.
Cons
  • Even with native LP-E6N the charge is consumed extremely quickly; it would appear that technology is advancing and electronics are becoming less power-hungry, but not from Canon. The video capabilities are still for show (due to restrictions on the recording format and the lack of necessary details). 4-5 like the 5DSR, typically shoots without blurring at shutter speeds from 1/200 and shorter, on telephoto cameras you have to raise the ISO, you will need to eat the optics fleet, if you have lenses from the penultimate generation and older, the picture will be soapy at 30 matrices, the same pretty decent colors at ISO up to 1600 and the same hard software "improvers" the picture is quite pleasant, "proprietary" unlike competitors, days as actively as possible to test Errors within the first 14 days indicate a likely fault in the main board and warrant a return for a replacement.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didnt expect the quality to be so high.

especially as it came out with the dual pixel technology, the entire picture is totally available by lenses; both (two) with an aperture of 1.2 perform accurately and wonderfully. This is especially true in the bright portions of the image.

Cons
  • help with D+ doesn't work fine only with disabled lens enhancers in the camera options, and there is no information left to be found.

Before the mark IV, there was the mark III (now both cameras), before that there was the 6D, and even earlier than that there was the Nikon D3s and the Nikon D700 already on the first shot, DDs are wider and stretch better, functioning ISO is higher, exposure metering is more accurate, and there is no need in changing.

Pros
  • In comparison to the 5D III, I will write a review focusing on the following useful features: 1 When set to this mode, the camera achieves a focus that is virtually as good as when using the viewfinder; more specifically, when you can see almost everything on the screen. 2 It was a very difficult circumstance for those who, like me, frequently shoot with this setting because the semi-automatic mode did not have the capability to make an adjustment. 3 The camera features two different automatic exposure bracketing (auto bb) modes: "with the preservation of the atmosphere of the scene" and "with white priority." When the camera is set to auto bb mode with white priority, the following settings are applied: 4 This capability is a good bonus, but out of habit, I perform practically everything with the joysticks and a button on the camera body. Poking the screen on the area where focus is needed helps a lot to work swiftly in Live View mode; you may do this by focusing on the area. 5 mark III, the shutter grew quieter, and you should rate it if you photograph at conferences or in theaters. 6 The ISO setting of 12800 is certainly usable, however it is important to note that although I shoot reports in full RAW, primarily for the web, on the mark III, I did not consider any setting higher than 6400 to be a working ISO. 7 8 GPS, dual pixel, 30 It's great that all of these functions are built into the camera, but I haven't gotten the chance to try any of them out yet.
Cons
  • For me personally, as someone who solely utilizes IV for photography,

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

I pay for one week, which is equivalent to three I took pictures for a third of a nickel sometimes indoors when I was just starting out as an amateur photographer. I wanted more resolution from this camera (so that the detail of the face in a chest portrait would be equal to the "facial" one at 3 nickel), large working ISO (sometimes I shoot in the evening without external light) now ISO 3200 is absolutely working, 6400 is conditionally working, there is almost no noise at 6400, I would not say

Pros
  • Autofocus with dual pixels, burst mode, touch screen, and 30 megapixels are just few of the features of this camera.
Cons
  • Lengthened the time between charges.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

An ideal product for any type of consumer.

You either write just like that, and did not use the camera, professional camera that can go high in the mountains, and in rain, and in snow, why I love Canon - it' I switched from 5dM2, and honestly, if you are not a professional, feel free to stay on 5dM2. As I stated in my article, this camera is bought either by those who love novelties. Dependability when it's raining? GPS? Using the viewfinder, concentrate on the face? studied the camera before (EOS iTR AF - the function is in 7dM2…

Pros
  • shutter noise dynamic range, button reassignment, and screen EOS iTR AF (I dreamed of this when I was younger:) - it actually happened), Possibility of interval shooting (for instance, shooting buds in blossom); a new button to select the AF area, the capability of using 220 volts to power the camera quality of the video, electronic leveling along the axis, USB 3.0 reinforced moisture and dust resistance the capacity to record video in MP4 format and instantly integrate it to smart, cropping pictures after taking them A new AF settings system
Cons
  • You can write what the manufacturer has stated, and according to this review, it does not support UHS-II cards.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Poor quality, not suitable for use.

Since advancement does not halt, as the owner of the Canon 5D Mark 2, he considered using the camera. The 5D Mark 2 remained in the window until 2022, and there are now 9 glossy magazines available for the price of $199. I rented this camera for $175 per day to compare the Canon 5D Mark 4 and 5D Mark 2 before making a purchase. Additionally, I contrasted the Canon RP with the 5D Mark 2, and the RP only lost two heads to the 5D Mark 2. However, the fact that the Canon website only lists the 5D…

Pros
  • Touch screen, you can use your finger to choose focus points while shooting straight on the screen.
Cons
  • The matrix is no more artistic than the Canon 5D Mark 2 2022 or worse.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

I shoot sports in dark rooms, and the viewfinder adjusts to the ISO scale; if it shows detection in the -2 / -3 range, the viewfinder is dark, and the focus does not work as expected; those who shoot in RAW and emerge from dark shades will understand that this is not a mirrorless viewfinder.

Pros
  • It takes roughly 1,550,000 shots before the shutter gives out. After two years, the official warranty was fulfilled, and the shutter and actuator were replaced free of charge.
Cons
  • Perhaps Cost,

After he started having problems, she had a Canon 6d camera for about four years. If without frills, the client can also give the source code without the usual tinkering with them, as I'm used to. Yes, the picture is initially contrasting, the skin tone is most often excellent, the white balance is almost always correct (the flicker suppression function is a thing, it was difficult to achieve an even picture with lumi lamps before, and also garlands obey the same logic, generally excellent)…

Pros
  • Ergonomics A well-balanced white Range of Motion Credible resources that you may confidently present (and publish) to your client. autofocus Wireless Internet Capable Touch Panel In-viewfinder electronic leveling system Flicker-prevention technology Liveview's autofocus is top-notch.
Cons
  • Zhor battery, especially when the screen is used frequently. Sigma lenses don't work well with this gadget. The display adds so much polish to the image that checking the sharpness is impossible. When asking for permission, the camera's ISO drops below its working ISO, making it less sensitive to motion (requiring a shutter speed of at least 1/400 or more) than it otherwise would be. Most optics become soapy at 30 mp.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, Im glad I chose this option.

I feel like my shots lack the resolution that they should have because I use f/2.8 for street photography and f/2.8 and 70-200mm lenses for sports photography like taking pictures of boxers in the ring. 32 megapixels was not sufficient! I want 50! This is known as the 5DSR. To put it succinctly, don't bother! Consider doing so if you photograph things like sports, weddings, or children in addition to fashion when you're in the studio.

Pros
  • excellent machine in every respect
Cons
  • disclosed as soon as he arrived at the studio for the very first time

On paper, it would appear that there are not many differences between the 5D3 and the 7D. The white balance no longer shifts into a magenta hue when exposed to natural light. The exposure metering works fairly properly, of course. Such a wow impact was only seen with the 1Ds3, but the 5D4, despite the fact that it looks quite similar to the 1Ds3, feels like it was thoroughly thought out for any type of shooting. 5D4 Examples of photos can be found at https://fotki.com.

Pros
  • - Color! - Accurate AWB - Extremely accurate and quick autofocus via both the VI and Dual Pixel AF - AF sensitivity via the VI is -3EV, while the Live View setting is -4EV a touchscreen and many control options - A resolution of 30 megapixels is sufficient for the majority of tasks - strong performance of the camera in bright situations - the adaptability and versatility of the camera - the availability of two memory card slots - the simplicity of processing RAW files and obtaining the final product - the ergonomic design of the grip - WiFi and GPS connectivity
Cons
  • despite the fact that it consumes battery life like a camel, it will not shoot at you.