Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 29
  • 5
    13
  • 4
    10
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

For Chevy Niva, the vehicle was, as they say, heaven and earth as compared to the typical Kama. I even wrote my first review because I was so amazed! I haven't yet ventured into the muck, but based on the tread, the typical off-road vehicle is fairly capable. has benefits I did so after saying the customary Kama. Feelings - as if he had switched to a different vehicle: the dynamics much improved, the noise subsided, and a roll appeared. I was unaware that tires could alter a car's behavior in…

Revainrating 1 out of 5

The product is of poor quality, I do not advise.

A size 245/70/16 was purchased for the Pajero Sport. This is how I feel about it. DO NOT BUY THEM EVER! Due to an imbalance in the wheel's rotation, the tires will "jump" in opposite directions. It is impossible to drive, and it is difficult to picture what would happen with the suspension and running gear. Somehow, they managed to balance it. After 60 miles per hour (100 kilometers per hour), the entire car rattles. The wheel was examined by the official distributor in our region, who found…

Pros
  • Drawing
Cons
  • Imbalance Tire curves Above 90 kilometers per hour, the vehicle begins to vibrate, despite the fact that the tire is rated for a maximum speed of 210 kilometers per hour.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A reliable product, quality is acceptable.

04/21/2022 The tires were nice. Having never driven on All-Terrain tires before, all I have to base my opinion on is how well the stock (Mazda BT-50) Bridgestone Dueler performed. Much more heavy-weight in comparison. Rigid. Not a balancing force. After 1000 kilometers, the tire shop suggested I rebalance the wheels again. Shockingly quiet comfort, rubber. There is no perceptible aerodynamic noise on the test track. At all. Marvelous. Good job, pit. Light off-roading is a proven success…

Pros
  • Value and noise reduction comfort level.
Cons
  • It has not been decided.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I did not regret the purchase, everything is fine.

Rubber, in general, 99% justifies its price. You can use it all year long if your head is on your shoulders and there is no wind, but it's best not to! How many seasons it lasts will be determined over time, but for 10,000 kilometers, no. With advantages: 1) Price. 2) Usually on a country road with asphalt, so everything is great. 3) She had been gone for about a year, yet the protection had not changed. 4) Now that there is a fair lot of snow and ice in some places, I don't feel inadequate or…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I expected mediocre quality, but it was a pleasant surprise.

Since no one has rolled on it in more than a year, the tires are still very new. For light off-road and forest paths, it was bought in June for a Toyota Estima automobile with a dimension of 205/70/15. Although Yokohama Geolandar A/T-S G012 tires, which are particularly popular among crossover owners, were also taken into consideration, Cordiant was more affordable. I used Geolandar on the prior car, so I can compare the two rubbers from that perspective. 1. Noise. Because the diesel engine may

Pros
  • Cost and manufacturer
Cons
  • Unpopular and unsuitable for winter use

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Terrible quality, wasted money.

Completely inflated tires. However, before this miraculous event, there were kama fly and a Chinese bonture stalker. There wasn't a car pearl like a tank in any gravel in this; the pebbles in the tire got stuck, and then the pavement started on the body on the asphalt, and for a very long time after the gravel road. If you give it ten serious thoughts before attempting a climb, you won't succeed.

Pros
  • The pricing was the only selling point for me.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing ordinary, a normal product.

I didn't have time to venture off the tarmac throughout the season, so I can't assess their off-road capabilities. reacts nicely when on asphalt. The track is not given much; it is soft, quiet, and swallows pits. The third image demonstrates sidewall pressing with a balloon wrench as wear is visible. The fifth cylinder proved useful))) I purchased a second one, and now the front tires are once more brand-new, torn to pieces, and the remaining front tires are worn out and should be used as…

Pros
  • Price and adaptability at.
Cons
  • 1. Resistance to wear. The season's first purchase was five pieces of rubber. 7900 miles between March and November. I take kids to and from school, therefore my driving style is not harsh. The crumbling has ended. The front cylinders appear to be four or five seasons old in terms of wear and tear. After 6 (!) seasons of standing in front of the Cordiants in this condition (of course, alternating front and rear), Hankook was admitted without hesitation into the "cutting" a year later. After front and back are alternated, these have a maximum lifespan of two more seasons. Therefore, 3 seasons of Korda were played versus 7 Hankuk. Very feeble. 2. A slow sidewall. I proceeded to the side of the road from the incoming lane on a two-lane, but narrow, road at a speed of 30 to 35 mph (some residents can only drive in the middle of the road), and the front axle on the right caught a hole. The balloon quickly lost air. I quickly discovered the cause: the impact caused the inner sidewall to fold in half and be cut by the rim. There are no other justifications. Pit lacking fixtures.