Lens feels good, looks good and the photos you take with it have it also this unmistakable look Fuji. until you zoom in. This is a good entry-level lens - I think it's much better quality than the kit lens that comes with an entry-level Canon DSLR. The build quality is fantastic and the image quality is at least as high, if not better, than other lenses. Lower apertures compared to other kit lenses is one of the key benefits. However, wide apertures are also very blurry in my example. It's only

I bought the X-E2 with an XC16-50mm lens, both used as test/trial lenses. Gradually, my Nikon+ lenses became less and less used and eventually sold. In the meantime I've bought a couple of Fuji Prime lenses. Then I had to buy X-PRO-2. Some time later I found that as much as I liked the XC16-50 I was used to the aperture ring (which the 16-50 lacks) so I bought it after seeing a used XF18-55mm at Revain. Aperture ring, why is it better than the XC18-55? Most important (to me) is the large…